How much did THE MT SINAI HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION grant in FY2023?

Philanthropy$17MHealth$5.9MEducation$4.1MHuman Services$2.7MCommunity Improvement$2.0MFood & Nutrition$365kEmployment$336kCivil Rights$312kCrime & Legal$288kOther$4.6M

02FY2023 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k5 grants · $36k
$10k–50k24 grants · $558k
$50k–250k32 grants · $2.8M
$250k+4 grants · $5.3M

$58,000

Median grant

States reached

$174M

Total assets

Largest grants

JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND$3,800,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$750,000
OHIO WOMEN'S ALLIANCE$500,000
Metrohealth$300,000
SENIOR TRANSPORTATION CONNECTION$173,961
HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF OHIO$150,000
CLEVELAND FOUNDATION$125,000
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS$119,000
MOBILEMED 1 INC (DBA MEDWORKS)$115,000
CUYAHOGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$110,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND$100,000
MILESTONES AUTISM RESOURCES$100,000
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND$100,000
OHIO CITY INC$100,000
JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC$100,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$34M · 66 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

66 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2023, 24 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$34M

$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%

+22%

Still filing today

94%

82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

Case Western Reserve University
6× · 2018–2023 · $3.4M · revenue +26%
M
Metrohealth
4× · 2019–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +65%
ST
Snr Transportation Connection of Cuyahoga
5× · 2018–2023 · $906k · revenue +61%

Funded once

CC
Canopy Child Advocacy Centergraduated
one grant, 2022 · $199k · revenue +64% · 26% of their budget
MP
Menorah Park Center for Senior Living
one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue +11%
The Cleveland Clinic Foundationgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $110k · revenue +62%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services

Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers engages people to serve the community through meaningful volunteer opportunities.

Philanthropy

Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement

Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stages of life.

Human Services

Ohio Justice and Policy Center

To create fair, intelligent, redemptive criminal justice systems through zealous client-centered advocacy, innovative policy reform and cross-sector community education.

Civil Rights

Visiting Nurse Association of Cleveland

To provide compassionate, innovative and effective community-based care that promotes, health, indpendence and dignity to those we serve in the northest and central ohio.

Health

Jewish Federation of Cincinnati

The Jewish Federation of Cincinnati brings our community together to care for Jews.

Philanthropy

Literary Cleveland

Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.

Education

JewishColumbus

To Enrich Jewish Life & Instill Jewish Pride; Protect Our Community; Connect with Israel & World Jewry; Help Vulnerable Jewish Populations

Religion

Jewish Family Service of the

Provide counseling, support economic well-being and provide aging services.

Human Services

OhioHealth Corporation

Our mission is to improve the health of those we serve.

Health

Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Cleveland and the most unlike its peers is Ideastream. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%3/144

the rest of the field

11%

1,106/9,674

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

132 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

125/132

Grantees still filing

101/132

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Philanthropy$17,061,800Health$5,899,271Education$4,140,631Other$5,511,064Human Services$2,706,046Community Improvement$1,988,450Food & Nutrition$365,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH141× affinity91 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation · United Way of Greater Cleveland · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland · Saint Lukes Foundation of Cleveland Ohio · Treu Mart Fund · Community West Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE MT SINAI HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HOMELESS HOOKUP.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +64% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 830924756 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on HOMELESS HOOKUP, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 70% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE MT SINAI HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

132 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE MT SINAI HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

132 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation?

More from the funding graph