Skip to content

· Private foundation

The MPRI Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$98kPhilanthropy$65kHealth$62kHuman Services$15kFood & Nutrition$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$902k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMERICA CHARITABLE TRUST$10,000
BONEI OLAM INC$8,610
Individual grant recipient$3,800
Other Charities$2,870
Kupat Eizer Nisuin Bais Yisroel$2,500
Keren Ohr Chaim$2,500
Congregation Keren Ohr Chaim D Bobov$2,500
Bikur Cholim of Cleveland$2,000
Hatzolah Emergency Medical Services Inc$2,000
Rofeh Cholim Cancer Society Inc$1,000
Torah Life Institute of Cleveland$1,000
Mishneh Shli$750
Matan B Sayser Inc$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Bikur Cholim of Cleveland: $2k → 17%Bikur Cholim of Cleveland: $2k → 17%Bikur Cholim of Cleveland: $2k → 17%Bikur Cholim of Cleveland: $1k → 17%Bikur Cholim of Cleveland: $1k → 17%BONEI OLAM INC: $9k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $8k → 20%Bikur Cholim of Cleveland: $1k → 17%BONEI OLAM INC: $8k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $7k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $6k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $6k → 20%Bonei Olom: $5k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $5k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $1k → 20%Bonei Olam Inc: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$193k · 16 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
16

Total granted

$193k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
-7%

Still filing today

31%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $55k · revenue +160%
  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +101%
  • HE
    HATZOLAH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • CC
    Commercia Charitable Trust
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • TF
    TZUR FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • MH
    Machzikei Hadaath Rabbinical College
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
2
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Bikur Cholim of Manhattan Inc

To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…

Health
4
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
5
Bonei Olam Division of Central Jersey Inc

Bonei Olam provides financial assistance,guidance & referrals for assisted reproductive technology,including consultations, work up, medications, high risk pregnancy,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis,pre & post…

International
6
Kolel Zichron Avrohom Inc

Supervision of kosher meal preparation

Religion
7
Kupat Givat Hamivtar

Charitable organization for the welfare, development, and relief of communities that are overburdened with poverty and help fund judaic studies

Human Services
8
Zera Koidesh Inc

To award financial grants to religios orthodox jewish organizations and to help by financial means, the needy, sick and disabled people.

—
9
Bonei Olam Division of Rockland County

Bonei Olam provides financial assistance,guidance & referrals for assisted reproductive technology,including consultations, work up, medications, high risk pregnancy,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis,pre & post…

International
10
Zocher Chasdai Ovos

Jewish Observance of Shabbos, Chagim, Torah Learning

Religion
11
Kollel Chazon Ish

To make grants to religious and charitable organizations

—
12
Ksav Sofer Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rofeh Cholim Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Comerica Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEREN OHR CHAIM: $27,500 · OtherKEREN OHR CHAIMIndividual grant recipient: $20,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKUPAT EIZER NISUIN BAIS YISROEL: $14,000 · OtherKUPAT EIZER NISUIN BAIS YISROELGERER TESHIVAH AND MESIVTA MACHZIKEL HADATH: $14,000 · OtherGERER TESHIVAH AND MESIVTA MACHZIKEL HADATHKOLEL CHASIDEI GUR: $8,000 · OtherKOLEL CHASIDEI GUROther Charities: $6,210 · OtherCommercia Charitable Trust: $6,000 · OtherTORAH LIFE INSTITUTE OF CLEVELAND: $5,500 · OtherMachzikei Hadaath Rabbinical College: $5,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KEREN OHR CHAIM D BOBOV: $5,000 · Other+15 more: $22,600 · Other+15 moreCOMERICA CHARITABLE TRUST: $55,500 · PhilanthropyCOMERICA CHARITABLE TRUSTMatan BSayser of Cleveland Inc: $7,000 · PhilanthropyMatan BSayser of Cleveland I…ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $6,500 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY …Bonei Olam Inc: $54,610 · Human ServicesBonei Olam IncBIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $8,900 · Human ServicesBIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELANDHATZOLAH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES: $7,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · ReligionKESHER NAFSHI INC: $500 · Health
Other$134,210Philanthropy$69,000Human Services$63,510Public Safety & Disaster$7,000Religion$5,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMERICA CHARITABLE TRUST: $55,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $54,610 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND: $8,900 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHATZOLAH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMatan BSayser of Cleveland Inc: $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN YAD V'EIZER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKESHER NAFSHI INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMERICA CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds HATZOLAH EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Matan BSayser of Cleveland Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN YAD V'EIZER INC ↗
  • Who funds KESHER NAFSHI INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY34.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Friends of Mosdot Goor · The Foundation for Hope · Jewish Communal Fund · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Donors Fund Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The MPRI Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The MPRI Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on MPRI’s filings →

    More from the funding graph