Skip to content

· Public charity

The Morton L and Amy R Friedkin Supporting Foundation

Supports charitable, educational, & religious purposes of jewish comm federation of sf.

$755k
Granted FY2017
8
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$500k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

82% of The Morton L and Amy R Friedkin Supporting Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Community Federation Of San Francisco The Peninsula Marin & Sonoma, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year The Morton L and Amy R Friedkin Supporting Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $752k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
2
’18
2
’20
2
’21
2
’22
2
’23
0
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$500kPhilanthropy$394kEducation$335kRecreation & Sports$42kHuman Services$10kReligion$10k
02FY2017 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $147k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$500,000
MILLS COLLEGE$100,000
CAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$41,700
ISRAEL21C$40,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE EAST BAY$35,000
THE ICENTER$20,000
TEMPLE B'NAI HAYIM$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 45% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%CONTRA COSTA MIDRASHA: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $29k → 10%ISRAEL21C: $40k → 10%CAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $42k → 13%TEMPLE B'NAI HAYIM: $10k → 14%UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $500k → 14%THE RELIEF NURSERY: $5k → 15%THE ICENTER: $20k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $25k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $200k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $15k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $104k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $14k → 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $50k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $14k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $5k → 10%JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE EAST BAY: $35k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $27k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $13k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $13k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $13k → 10%OAKLAND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $11k → 10%MILLS COLLEGE: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of The Morton L and Amy R Friedkin Supporting Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 59% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 37%.

The Morton L and Amy R Friedkin Supporting Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 22% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
2
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
3
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
4
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

—
5
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
6
San Francisco Jewish Community Publications Inc

(continued from page 1) nationally and internationally. Further, J seeks to enrich the cultural, religious and social life of the community through its articles, interviews and features.

Education
7
Hillel of Silicon Valley Inc

Hillel of silicon valley provides a welcoming, supportive environmentto enrich students' college experience and enable them to connect with the jewish community and israel.

—
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
9
Chabad of Columbia University

To educate jewish students based on chabad chassidic philosophy, advance their understanding of jewish ideas and foster their jewishness.

—
10
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
11
Jewish Federation of the Sacra

To serve and enrich the Jewish community and those who support and identify with it, in the greater Sacramento area, Israel, and the world.

Philanthropy
12
JewishColumbus

Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $500,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial MuseumJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $353,600 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF …UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $97,680 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALI…Oakland Hebrew Day School: $77,350 · EducationOakland Hebrew Day…Israel 21c: $40,000 · EducationIsrael 21cMILLS COLLEGE: $100,000 · OtherMILLS COLLEGEJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF THE GREATER EAST BAY: $35,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUN…TEMPLE BNAI HAYIM: $10,000 · OtherTEMPLE BNAI H…+2 more: $10,000 · Other+2 moreCAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $41,700 · Recreation & SportsISRAEL EDUCATION RESOURCE CENTER INC: $20,000 · ReligionJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $5,000 · Health
Arts & Culture$500,000Philanthropy$353,600Education$215,030Other$155,000Recreation & Sports$41,700Religion$20,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $500,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $353,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMILLS COLLEGE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $97,680 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOakland Hebrew Day School: $77,350 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $41,700 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF THE GREATER EAST BAY: $35,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetISRAEL EDUCATION RESOURCE CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRELIEF NURSERY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jewish Community FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jewish Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Morton L and Amy R Friedkin Supporting Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Morton L and Amy R Friedkin Supporting Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Relief Nursery Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Morton L and Amy R Friedkin Supporting Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Morton L and Amy R Friedkin Supporting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morton L and Amy R Friedkin Supporting’s filings →

More from the funding graph