Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Morgan Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$923k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$1.5MHuman Services$725kCrime & Legal$664kEducation$602kHealth$117kRecreation & Sports$70kFood & Nutrition$60kInternational$55kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $223k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $435k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$15,696
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SETX CHURCH$250,000
LAMAR UNIVERSITY$215,273
POWER CASTLE MINISTRIES$60,000
CASA$60,000
FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS$50,000
SOME OTHER PLACE$50,000
GARTH HOUSE$38,000
Individual grant recipient$33,857
ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$30,862
JOE PYBURN FOUNDATION$20,000
TEXAS A & M KINGSVILLE$15,696
NUTRITION SERVICES FOR SENIORS$15,000
HOPE CENTER$15,000
THE ARC OF GREATER BEAUMONT$15,000
TRINITY WEEKDAY MINISTRIES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $964k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GARTH HOUSE: $94k → 19%GARTH HOUSE: $65k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $65k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $60k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $60k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $60k → 19%GARTH HOUSE: $60k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $60k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $60k → 19%GARTH HOUSE: $60k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $60k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $60k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $50k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $50k → 19%GARTH HOUSE: $38k → 19%GARTH HOUSE: $32k → 19%GIRLS' HAVEN: $10k → 19%GIRLS' HAVEN: $10k → 19%GIRL'S HAVEN: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 26 repeat orgs$360k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
9

Total granted

$3.7M
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+84%

Still filing today

42%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $292k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsReligionHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    Garth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $349k · revenue +23%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $295k · revenue +148%
  • AM
    ALL MY HEART HAITI INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $55k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • WE
    WEST END LITTLE LEAGUE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +16%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
2
Scottys House Brazos Valley Child Advocacy Center Inc

The mission of Scottys House is to provide safety, healing and justice for children victimized by abuse through professional assessment, counseling and education in a compassionate and collaborative approach.

Health
3
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
4
Autism Society of Texas

The Autism Society is committed to educating people about autism by written material and presentation. The society informs constituents about training, workshops, and presentation around the region. As resources allow, they also sponsor…

Health
5
Grace House Texarkana Inc

Grace House exists to rescue and advocate for women and families at risk.

Housing & Shelter
6
Humane Society of Southeast Texas

Humane education; animal adoption and placement; animal welfare.

Animals
7
Southeast Texas Family Resource Center Inc

The mission of the Southeast Texas Family Resource Center, which is located in Beaumonts Charlton-Pollard neighborhood, is to create and support programs and to participate in collaborative efforts dedicated to fostering positive cycles of…

Human Services
8
The Lullaby House

The Lullaby House missionis ot strengthen families by providing programs and services to teenage parents and familites in need which will inspire and promote generational change.

Youth Development
9
Central Texas Hospitality House

Our mission is to meet the spiritual and practical needs of the families of prisoners. We strive to provide a safe and caring home in whichfamilies can rest while visiting loved ones currently incarcerated in the adjacent prison system.

—
10
Casa for Kids of South Central Texas Inc

To recruit, train and supervise volunteers that advocate in the best interests of abused and neglected children in court.

Housing & Shelter
11
Teen and Family Services Austin

Teen and Family Services Austin provides counseling and education on an individual as well as group basis to provide support to parents and teens who are coping with teen high risk behavior.

—
12
The Giving Rose Foundation Atx
Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services of Southeast Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Austin Plastic Surgery Foundation Austin Smiles. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH: $900,000 · OtherCALVARY BAPTIST CHURCHLAMAR UNIVERSITY: $364,063 · OtherLAMAR UNIVERSITYCASA: $315,000 · OtherCASASETX CHURCH: $250,000 · OtherSETX CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $185,378 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCRAIG LARSON MINISTRIES: $150,000 · OtherPOWER CASTLE MINISTRIES: $135,000 · OtherTEXAS A & M KINGSVILLE: $109,113 · Other+21 more: $499,545 · Other+21 moreGarth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc: $348,500 · Human ServicesGarth House Mickey Mehaffy …FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $295,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAS…Some Other Place: $290,000 · Human ServicesSome Other Place+1 more: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE WALKER BELDEN FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Recreation & SportsALL MY HEART HAITI INC: $54,500 · ReligionArt Museum of Southeast Texas: $15,000 · Arts & CultureNECHES RIVER FESTIVAL INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $10,500 · HealthAustin Plastic Surgery Foundation Austin Smiles: $9,500 · International
Other$2,908,099Human Services$963,500Recreation & Sports$55,000Religion$54,500Arts & Culture$20,000Health$10,500International$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGarth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc: $348,500 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $295,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetSome Other Place: $290,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS TEXAS INC: $60,000 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetTHE WALKER BELDEN FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 5y, 90% of budgetALL MY HEART HAITI INC: $54,500 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetGIRLS' HAVEN INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetArt Museum of Southeast Texas: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetASCENSION SETON FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $10,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWEST END LITTLE LEAGUE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetAustin Plastic Surgery Foundation Austin Smiles: $9,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNECHES RIVER FESTIVAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Garth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Some Other Place ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WALKER BELDEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALL MY HEART HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS' HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Art Museum of Southeast Texas ↗
  • Who funds ASCENSION SETON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program ↗
  • Who funds WEST END LITTLE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Austin Plastic Surgery Foundation Austin Smiles ↗
  • Who funds NECHES RIVER FESTIVAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mechia FoundationTX24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mechia Foundation · The Bob and Karen Wortham Charitable Fou · Gay D and William F Scott Family Foundation · Penland Foundation · Foundation for Southeast Texas Inc · Juanita Parker Corbin Charitable Tr Charitable Trust · The Reaud Charitable Foundation Inc · He and Kate Dishman Charitable Trust · Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Gladys Bevil Charitable Trust · Simpson-Omohundro Foundation Omohundro Educational Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Morgan Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Morgan Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Morgan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph