· Private foundation
Simpson-Omohundro Foundation Omohundro Educational Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $44k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Tri-county Educational Foundation | $105,000 |
| All Saints Episcopal School | $18,500 |
| Southeast Texas Food Bank | $15,000 |
| Some Other Place | $10,000 |
| CASA of Southeast Texas Inc | $8,000 |
| Art Museum of Southeast Texas | $7,500 |
| BISD Public School Foundation | $5,000 |
| IEA-Inspire Encourage Achieve | $5,000 |
| Buckner Children and Family Service | $5,000 |
| St Anne Catholic School | $5,000 |
| Girls Haven | $5,000 |
| Anayat House Inc | $3,000 |
| Salvation Army | $3,000 |
| Saint Anne Catholic Church | $3,000 |
| Catholic Charities | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $312k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -57% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TETRI-COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION2× · 2024–2025 · $195k · revenue +21%
- STSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $112k · revenue +27%
- GHGIRLS' HAVEN INC9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +88%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $10k
- MGMAGNOLIA GARDEN CLUBone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -57%
- BCBUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILYone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.
Hospice of east texas seeks to enhance the quality of life for individuals and families dealing with life-limiting illness and to assist bereaved family members by providing comprehensive, coordinated care and support.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…
Texas Society of Architects is the voice for Texas architecture, supporting the creation of safe, beautiful, sustainable environments.
To alleviate hunger in the immediate service area through the distribution of food products donated by the usda, feeding america, area grocery stores, etc. which are distributed to the needy by way of area food banks and other qualified…
To provide efficient, effective, and professional prehospital emergency care and transportation to those living in the unincorporated areas of Taylor County, Texas and as requested by municipalities in Taylor County
To provide a place for children to go where they will have supervised activities, arts, crafts, and recreation.
Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.
To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.
St. Stephen's Episcopal School - Houston ("St. Stephen's", "the School") nurtures each child's academic, creative, and spiritual potential.
Nonprofit school chartered in the state of texas and monitored by the texas education agency.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls' Haven Inc and the most unlike its peers is Magnolia Garden Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds Some Other Place ↗
- Who funds GIRLS' HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Anayat House Inc ↗
- Who funds Art Museum of Southeast Texas ↗
- Who funds BEAUMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds IEA - INSPIRE ENCOURAGE ACHIEVE ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAGNOLIA GARDEN CLUB ↗
- Who funds SYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · Wilton and Effie Hebert Foundation · Mechia Foundation · He and Kate Dishman Charitable Trust · The Bob and Karen Wortham Charitable Fou · Gladys Bevil Charitable Trust · The Morgan Charitable Foundation · Mildred Yount Manion Charitable Foundation · Foundation for Southeast Texas Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Simpson-Omohundro Foundation Omohundro Educational Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Simpson-Omohundro Foundation Omohundro Educational Trust?
Find your warmest path to Simpson-Omohundro Foundation Omohundro Educational Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.