· Private foundation
Gay D and William F Scott Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k11 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $129k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $297k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST ANNE CATHOLIC CHURCH | $75,500 |
| MONSIGNOR KELLY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $71,270 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| DIOCESE OF BEAUMONT | $50,000 |
| C3 FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $32,000 |
| TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS | $18,667 |
| ST ANNE CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $15,040 |
| APPEAL FOR CATHOLIC MINISTRIES | $15,000 |
| THREE RIVERS COUNCIL 578 BOY SCOUTS OF | $13,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| EQUESTRIAN ORDER OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE | $6,000 |
| JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE | $5,000 |
| AUSTIN SMILES | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +7%
- JRJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program4× · 2021–2025 · $34k · revenue +16%
- APAustin Plastic Surgery Foundation Austin Smiles3× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- NCNATURE CONSERVANCYone grant, 2024 · $50k
- MCMASON COUNTY LIVESTOCK SHOW & EXPOone grant, 2021 · $45k
- ACAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -81%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Lamar State College Port Arthur Foundation is to promote advance support encourage sponsor aid and advocate solely for Lamar State College Port Arthur.
Hospice of east texas foundation operates for the benefit of hospice of east texas, a texas non-profit corporation.
The Foundation was formed to be a vital partner with Texas A&M University-Kingsville by developing donor relationships and linking resources in the pursuit of the University's goals of excellence.Values: Service to the University and the…
To assist in improving healthcare in Beauregard Parish, Louisiana.
Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.
To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…
The Alabama A&M University Foundation was established to receive, hold, invest, manage, use, and administer property of all kinds, whether given absolutely or in trust, for the benefit of Alabama A&M University and its educational,…
The purpose of the university research foundation is to promote texas state university's objectives of providing higher education, conducting research, providing public service, and assisting in economic development in texas.
To support and carry out the educational and charitable interests of the texas radiological society.
Provide support for southeast texas hospice inc, a non-profit organization providing hospice services for the southeast texas area
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas State University System Foundation and the most unlike its peers is C3 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Lamar University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - THREE RIVERS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of Southeast Texas ↗
- Who funds C3 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program ↗
- Who funds Austin Plastic Surgery Foundation Austin Smiles ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BORDERLANDS RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST DOMINIC VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds Go 4 The Bell Inc ↗
- Who funds Garth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF BEAUMONT ↗
- Who funds PORT ARTHUR HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NECHES RIVER FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds PORT ARTHUR HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Anayat House Inc ↗
- Who funds WEST END LITTLE LEAGUE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mechia Foundation · The Bob and Karen Wortham Charitable Fou · Penland Foundation · The Morgan Charitable Foundation · Juanita Parker Corbin Charitable Tr Charitable Trust · Christus Health Southeast Texas · Foundation for Southeast Texas Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Thomas Joseph Frank Foundation · The Connfertitta Charitable Foundation · Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · The Stephenson Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gay D and William F Scott Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.