· Private foundation
The Mona & Edward Zander Family Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k15 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $195k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
- $250k+2 grants · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UCSF FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $250,000 |
| HELPING FRIENDLY FARM INC | $125,000 |
| SCRIPPS HEALTH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| EISENHOWER HEALTH FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS | $25,000 |
| SUN VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL | $25,000 |
| GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MONTEREY | $22,500 |
| NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $21,053 |
| RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| SUN VALLEY MUSEUM OF ART | $11,070 |
| CARDINAL SPELLMAN HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| HILLSBOROUGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MCCALLUM THEATRE FOUNDATION | $8,740 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2022, 11 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LPLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH2× · 2020–2021 · $225k · revenue +8%
- GRGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2022 · $179k · revenue +74%
- BGBoys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County3× · 2020–2022 · $133k · revenue +21%
Funded once
Rensselaer Polytechnic Instituteone grant, 2020 · $210k · revenue +13%- MMMONTEREY MUSEUM OF ARTone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -47%
- CHCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULAone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Robert Louis Stevenson School and the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Opera Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds HELPING FRIENDLY FARM INC ↗
- Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
- Who funds GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds North Dakota State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAREY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MONTEREY MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds McCallum Theatre Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CURIODYSSEY ↗
- Who funds Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds CURRIKI ↗
- Who funds MAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22 ↗
- Who funds Can Do Multiple Sclerosis ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds AIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALL STARS HELPING KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds HILLSBOROUGH SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAFAYETTE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CARMEL MISSION FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Zander Family Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Monterey Peninsula Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Frisone Family Foundation · Donald Lee and Sally Steadman Lucas · Greene Van Arsdale Foundation co KKR Accounting Services LLC · Nancy Eccles and Homer M Hayward Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Mona & Edward Zander Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- The Tatnall School Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Mona & Edward Zander Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Mona & Edward Zander Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.