Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mitchell David Solomon Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$96kEnvironment$61kAnimals$22kHealth$18kEducation$14kArts & Culture$13kCivil Rights$12kScience & Tech$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$554k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gardens of Golden Gate Park$5,000
Oxfam$5,000
UNHCR$5,000
FINCA$5,000
KIND$3,000
Doctors without borders$3,000
KQED$2,500
Galapagos Conservancy$2,000
Western Environ Law Center$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Brown University$1,300
Partners in Health$1,000
Muttville$1,000
Environmental Defense Fund$1,000
Marin Humane Society$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Bernal Heights Neighborhood Center: $1k → 10%Bernal Heights Neiborhood Center: $500 → 10%Bernal Heights Neighborhood Center: $500 → 10%Bernal Heights Neighborhood Center: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
CT
RI
CA
UT
VA
MD
NM
TN
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$267k · 48 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
45

Total granted

$267k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+12%

Still filing today

56%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsInternationalEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +31%
  • EARTHJUSTICE
    5× · 2018–2023 · $17k · revenue +114%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +23%
  • S
    SFBGS
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • II
    IRC - Interenational Rescue Committ
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
4
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
5
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
6
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
12
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/48
Grantees still filing
38/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Oxfam: $16,000 · OtherOxfamPlanned Parenthood: $15,600 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $9,250 · OtherGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INCIndividual grant recipient: $7,300 · OtherWestern Environ Law Center: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherTHE CLEAR FUND: $8,000 · OtherTHE CLEAR FUNDBROWN UNIVERSITY: $5,050 · Other+58 more: $69,500 · Other+58 moreFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $24,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INCMADRE INC: $15,000 · InternationalMADRE INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES …United States Association for UNHCR: $9,000 · InternationalUnited States Association…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $4,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SC…+2 more: $2,500 · InternationalEARTHJUSTICE: $17,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICESAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM: $15,000 · EnvironmentSAN FRANCISCO …ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $6,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL …+3 more: $1,750 · EnvironmentMUTTVILLE: $8,400 · AnimalsMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,800 · AnimalsJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $2,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $2,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,800 · AnimalsTHE KERN PROJECT: $1,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE NORTH BAY: $750 · Animals+2 more: $1,000 · AnimalsKQED INC: $10,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC: $500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureKIND INC: $6,500 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,000 · Crime & LegalPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $7,000 · HealthPXE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · HealthPublic Health Institute: $500 · HealthBREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS: $500 · Health
Other$146,700International$68,500Environment$39,750Animals$19,750Arts & Culture$11,250Crime & Legal$9,500Health$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMADRE INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $10,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $9,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUTTVILLE: $8,400 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKIND INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $5,050 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBernal Heights Neighborhood Center: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAIR-FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWorksafe Inc: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KERN PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPXE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSan Francisco Estuary Institute: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE NORTH BAY: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREARLEY SCHOOL: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER PREVENTION PARTNERS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH VALLEY ANIMAL DISASTER GROUP: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Blues Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBay Nature Institute dba Bay Nature Bay Nature Magazine: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY AT STRYBING ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds MADRE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds MUTTVILLE ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEAR FUND ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds KIND INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Bernal Heights Neighborhood Center ↗
  • Who funds CAIR-FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX13.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mitchell David Solomon Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mitchell David Solomon Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Mitchell David Solomon Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Mitchell David Solomon Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mitchell David Solomon’s filings →

More from the funding graph