Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mitchell and Louis Shulman Charitable Trust

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$420kHuman Services$107kEducation$73kReligion$44kHealth$33kArts & Culture$19kRecreation & Sports$10kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CNY$4,000
TEMPLE NER TAMID$3,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$1,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CNY$667
THE REV THEATRE CO$500
FRONT ROW PLAYERS$500
EMPOWER PARKINSON INC$500
THE SPIRITUAL RENEWAL CENTER$500
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$200k · 14 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
18

Total granted

$200k
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-10%

Still filing today

43%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationHealthInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SYRACUSE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL
    3× · 2019–2021 · $16k · revenue +42%
  • EP
    EMPOWER PARKINSON INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue +157%
  • OI
    OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • SB
    Suny Brockport
    one grant, 2018 · $36k
  • OP
    ON POINT FOR COLLEGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +160%
  • BY
    BROOKLYN YOUTH SPORTS CLUB INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central New York Quest Inc

Central ny quest has been established to serve the needs of persons with intellectual, developmental and mental health disorders in the central new york region.

Human Services
2
Su Theatre Corporation D/B/a Syracuse Stage

Syracuse stage tells stories that engage, entertain, and inspire us to see life beyond our own experiences.

Arts & Culture
3
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
4
The City University of New York School of Law Foundation Inc

The foundation supports the law school in its mission to increase access to legal education to those from groups underrepresented in the profession and to prepare its graduates for public interest and public service practice.

Education
5
The Center for New York City Neighborhoods Inc

Our mission is to promote and protect affordable homeownership in new york so that middle- and working-class families are able to build strong, thriving communities.

Housing & Shelter
6
New York Jewish Agenda Inc

New york jewish agenda held events and briefings, and worked with elected officials and grass-tops leaders to enact our vision of a socially just new york.

Civil Rights
7
Downtown Syracuse Foundation Inc

To conduct research, identify best policies and practices, secure resources and implement programs and projects to support the revitalization of downtown syracuse.

Community Improvement
8
Suny Impact Foundation Inc

The suny impact foundation's mission is to support suny in taking what works to scale to drive student success. the foundation works with philanthropies and private sector partners to leverage investments in student success initiatives…

Education
9
Binghamton Philharmonic Inc

The mission of the Binghamton Philharmonic is building community through the power of live music.

Arts & Culture
10
Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corporation

The mission of the organization is to enhance and build resilient diverse communities, by supporting economic growth, creative community-based initiatives, and quality housing services in the neighborhoods it serves.

Housing & Shelter
11
Open New York Education Inc

Open new york education, inc. supports public education, awareness, and engagement around housing issues to help build a movement for a more abundant and inclusive new york.

Housing & Shelter
12
Visit Syracuse Inc

The purpose of the corporation is to provide for the encouragement, solicitation, promotion, procurement, and servicing of all forms of travel to and through onondaga county, new york, specifically including, but not limited to,…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central New York Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $404,756 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INCCENTRAL NEW YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTEMPLE ADATH YESHURAN: $39,800 · OtherTEMPLE ADATH YESHURANSuny Brockport: $36,000 · OtherSuny BrockportJewish Community Center: $33,500 · OtherJewish Community CenterMake A Wish Central NY Inc: $30,000 · OtherMake A Wish Central NY IncMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $25,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATIONThe Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundat: $10,000 · OtherCORNELL UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+14 more: $32,206 · Other+14 moreSYRACUSE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $15,500 · EducationON POINT FOR COLLEGE INC: $10,544 · Education+1 more: $550 · EducationEMPOWER PARKINSON INC: $10,500 · HealthOSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $1,000 · HealthMERRY-GO-ROUND PLAYHOUSE INC: $8,600 · Arts & CultureCNY Arts Inc: $1,000 · Arts & CultureFRONT ROW PLAYERS: $1,000 · Arts & CultureSyracuse Children's Theatre Inc: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesBROOKLYN YOUTH SPORTS CLUB INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsINKULULEKO INC: $3,000 · International
Philanthropy$419,756Other$237,006Education$26,594Health$21,500Arts & Culture$11,600Human Services$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000International$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $404,756 over 5y, 12% of budgetSYRACUSE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL: $15,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCENTRAL NEW YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetON POINT FOR COLLEGE INC: $10,544 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEMPOWER PARKINSON INC: $10,500 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetOSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN YOUTH SPORTS CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMERRY-GO-ROUND PLAYHOUSE INC: $8,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVERA HOUSE INC: $6,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINKULULEKO INC: $3,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCNY Arts Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRONT ROW PLAYERS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSyracuse Children's Theatre Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY CNY INC: $550 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSpiritual Renewal Center of Syracuse Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE HEBREW DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL NEW YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ON POINT FOR COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWER PARKINSON INC ↗
  • Who funds OSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN YOUTH SPORTS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds MERRY-GO-ROUND PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds VERA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds INKULULEKO INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds CNY Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRONT ROW PLAYERS ↗
  • Who funds Syracuse Children's Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY CNY INC ↗
  • Who funds Spiritual Renewal Center of Syracuse Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central New York Community Foundation IncNY23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central New York Community Foundation Inc · The John Ben Snow Foundation Inc · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · The Dorothy and Marshall M Reisman Foundation · The Rosamond Gifford Charitable Corporation · Allyn Family Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · The Horowitch Family Foundation · Green Family Foundation Inc · Richard S Shineman Foundation · Equitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mitchell and Louis Shulman Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mitchell and Louis Shulman Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Mitchell and Louis Shulman Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Mitchell and Louis Shulman Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mitchell and Louis Shulman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph