Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mirer Family Foundation Inc (Formerly Rick Mirer Children's Cha

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$65kRecreation & Sports$33kCommunity Improvement$20kYouth Development$19kPhilanthropy$16kHealth$13kHuman Services$7kReligion$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$826
Median grant
5
States reached
$78k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$20,300
CROSSROADS UNITED WAY$1,000
SAN DIEGO POLICE OFFICER'S ASSOCIAT$1,000
CITYLAX$826
CUREBOUND$500
MAKE-A-WISH$500
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION$500
THE V FOUNDATION$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%49ERS FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%49ERS FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%GOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%GOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
CA
MO
AZ
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of The Mirer Family Foundation Inc (Formerly Rick Mirer Children's Cha’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 47% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 44%.

The Mirer Family Foundation Inc (Formerly Rick Mirer Children's Chalessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$108k · 17 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
26

Total granted

$108k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+40%

Still filing today

41%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    Boys to Men Mentoring Network Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +119%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2022 · $3k · revenue +18%
  • TV
    THE V FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2024 · $1k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMM FOUND OF THE NAPA VALLEY
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • NS
    NATIVITY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
3
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
4
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
7
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
9
National Scleroderma Foundation Inc

The national scleroderma foundation's mission is to advance medical research, promote disease awareness, and provide support and education to people with scleroderma, their families and support networks.

Health
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
12
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding San Diego; the most unlike its peers is 3RD and Goal Foundation Attn Brian Veith. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMM FOUND OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $20,000 · OtherCOMM FOUND OF THE NAPA VALLEYCATHEDRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $17,633 · OtherCATHEDRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $11,160 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC: $7,100 · OtherCROSSROADS UNITED WAY INCUNDER DETAIL FILING REQUIREMENT: $6,575 · OtherUNDER DETAIL FILING REQUIREMENTBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GOSHEN: $6,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GOSHENNATIVITY SCHOOL: $3,800 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS DI MINIMUS CONTRIBUTI: $3,650 · Other+27 more: $23,525 · Other+27 moreGOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $40,300 · Human ServicesGOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS …SAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesSAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINER…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $30,701 · EducationUniversity of Not…Boys to Men Mentoring Network Inc: $10,073 · Youth DevelopmentAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,550 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $1,300 · HealthTHE DANNY BUTLER MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1,000 · HealthCUREBOUND: $1,000 · HealthCaringBridge: $1,000 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $500 · HealthMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $300 · Health+1 more: $200 · HealthROLF BENIRSCHKE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Public BenefitTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $1,011 · Arts & Culture
Other$99,943Human Services$43,300Education$30,701Youth Development$10,073Health$8,850Public Benefit$2,000Arts & Culture$1,011

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $40,300 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $30,701 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBoys to Men Mentoring Network Inc: $10,073 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC: $7,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROLF BENIRSCHKE LEGACY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,082 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $1,011 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DANNY BUTLER MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCUREBOUND: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY LAX INC: $826 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budget3RD AND GOAL FOUNDATION ATTN BRIAN VEITH: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SNOW FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELUNA FORMERLY THE MOYER FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOSHEN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Boys to Men Mentoring Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROLF BENIRSCHKE LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE DANNY BUTLER MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
  • Who funds CaringBridge ↗
  • Who funds CITY LAX INC ↗
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY11.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mirer Family Foundation Inc (Formerly Rick Mirer Children's Cha funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mirer Family Foundation Inc (Formerly Rick Mirer Children's Cha. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Mirer Family Foundation Inc (Formerly Rick Mirer Children's Cha?

    Find your warmest path to The Mirer Family Foundation Inc (Formerly Rick Mirer Children's Cha through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mirer Family Foundation Inc (Formerly Rick Mirer Children's Cha’s filings →

    More from the funding graph