Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mick and Sandy Lee Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$236k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$652kEducation$474kPublic Benefit$170kInternational$86kCrime & Legal$65kHuman Services$23kYouth Development$18kPhilanthropy$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $101k
$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$179k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALVARY LUTHERAN CHURCH$100,500
PROVIDENCE ACADEMY$30,000
CENTER OF THE AMERICAN EXPERIMENT$15,000
TAKE CHARGE$15,000
UPPER MIDWEST LAW CENTER$15,000
ALPHA NEWS$10,200
MAZAHUA VALLEY MINISTRIES$10,000
LAMPLIGHTERS INTERNATIONAL$10,000
TANZANIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$5,000
NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
NORTHEAST BANK FOUNDATION$4,000
HERITAGE FOUNDATION$2,500
MN FAMILY INSTITUTE$2,500
PRAGER U$2,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WISHES & MORE: $400 → 7%UKRANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
CA
CO
MO
AZ
NC
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 26 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
19

Total granted

$1.9M
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+12%

Still filing today

58%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthReligionInternationalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PROVIDENCE ACADEMY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $235k · revenue +12%
  • CO
    Center of the American Experiment
    6× · 2019–2024 · $93k · revenue +17%
  • AN
    ALPHA NEWS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +285%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CRU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • C
    CRU
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • UA
    UKRAINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
2
Crown College

The mission of crown college is to provide a biblically based education for christian leadership in the christian and missionary alliance, the church-at-large, and the world.

—
3
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Luther Classical College

Luther classical college educates lutherans in the classical, lutheran tradition and prepares them for godly vocations within family, church, and society, fostering christian culture through study of the best of our western heritage.

Education
6
Mid-America Christian University Inc

Mid-america christian university prepares students through a wesleyan perspective to create, collaborate, and innovate to solve local and global problems for the glory of god through jesus christ and the good of society.

—
7
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
8
Liberty Classical Academy

Liberty classical academy is an independent private school offering college-preparatory academics and christian faith in the classical tradition for minneapolis-st. paul students in preschool and kindergarten through the 12th grade.

Education
9
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
10
Tabor College

Preparing people for a life of learning, work, and service for Christ and His kingdom.

Education
11
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
12
Global Scholars

Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALVARY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $552,081 · OtherCALVARY LUTHERAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $381,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALPHA NEWS: $65,200 · OtherALPHA NEWSTAKE CHARGE: $40,000 · Other+30 more: $121,950 · Other+30 morePROVIDENCE ACADEMY: $235,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE ACADEMYLUTHER COLLEGE: $130,000 · EducationLUTHER COLLEGEHOPE ACADEMY INC: $50,600 · EducationHOPE ACADEMY INC+4 more: $32,500 · Education+4 moreTANZANIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP: $85,000 · InternationalMAZAHUA VALLEY MINISTRIEs: $56,000 · InternationalCenter of the American Experiment: $92,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentUPPER MIDWEST LAW CENTER: $65,000 · Crime & LegalLAMPLIGHTERS INTERNATIONAL: $26,500 · ReligionTHE FELLOWSHIP OF AILBE: $4,000 · Religion+1 more: $500 · ReligionTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $12,600 · Public Benefit
Other$1,160,731Education$448,100International$141,000Youth Development$102,500Crime & Legal$65,000Religion$31,000Public Benefit$12,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROVIDENCE ACADEMY: $235,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $130,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCenter of the American Experiment: $92,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTANZANIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP: $85,000 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetALPHA NEWS: $65,200 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetUPPER MIDWEST LAW CENTER: $65,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetMAZAHUA VALLEY MINISTRIEs: $56,000 over 6y, 7.5% of budgetHOPE ACADEMY INC: $50,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLAMPLIGHTERS INTERNATIONAL: $26,500 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $12,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Charlemagne Institute: $7,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUKRAINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPoetice: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FELLOWSHIP OF AILBE: $4,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMinnesota Teen Challenge Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF NGONG ROAD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Colson Center for Christian Worldview: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISHES & MORE: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROVIDENCE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LUTHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Center of the American Experiment ↗
  • Who funds TANZANIA HEALTH PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA NEWS ↗
  • Who funds UPPER MIDWEST LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MAZAHUA VALLEY MINISTRIEs ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds LAMPLIGHTERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds The Charlemagne Institute ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Poetice ↗
  • Who funds THE FELLOWSHIP OF AILBE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NGONG ROAD ↗
  • Who funds The Colson Center for Christian Worldview ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN19.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Pine Rock Foundation Inc · Michael J & Karen B Frey Foundation · Caridad Corporation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · United Way Worldwide · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mick and Sandy Lee Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mick and Sandy Lee Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mick and Sandy Lee Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph