· Private foundation
Pine Rock Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $215k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+6 grants · $4.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BIG SKY BRAVERY | $3,000,000 |
| FRIENDS OF EDUCATION | $350,000 |
| ALPHA NEWS | $300,000 |
| UPPER MIDWEST LAW CENTER | $300,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA | $300,000 |
| ALPHA NEWS | $250,000 |
| PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| CHAPEL BY THE SEA | $150,000 |
| CENTER OF THE AMERICAN EXPERIMENT | $100,000 |
| PAGE HIGH SCHOOL PTO | $100,000 |
| MINNESOTA VOTERS ALLIANCE | $100,000 |
| DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER | $100,000 |
| PROVIDENCE ACADEMY | $100,000 |
| MEMORIES OF HONOR | $100,000 |
| CENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC DBA ARTS BONITA | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
40 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $254k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BSBIG SKY BRAVERY FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +314%
- PAPROVIDENCE ACADEMY4× · 2021–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +17%
- ANALPHA NEWS6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +285% · 26% of their budget
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF CENTER OF THE AMERICAN EXPERIMENTone grant, 2023 · $900k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +37%
- MMMINNESOTA MILITARY AND VETERANS MUSEUMone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…
The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."
Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…
The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…
The mission of minnesota public radio is creating the future of public media by amplifying voices to inform, include, and inspire.
To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.
The foundation for individual rights and expression's (fire's) mission is to defend and sustain the individual rights of all americans to free speech and free thought-the most essential qualities of liberty.(continued on schedule o)fire…
Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Education and the most unlike its peers is Java Forever Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BIG SKY BRAVERY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds DING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ALPHA NEWS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds UPPER MIDWEST LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Page High School PTO ↗
- Who funds CABLE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Center of the American Experiment ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA VOTERS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Memories of Honor Inc ↗
- Who funds THE WELL OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR THE ARTS OF BONITA SPRINGS INC ↗
- Who funds ARRINGTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE OWEN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA MILITARY AND VETERANS MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds CABLE COMMUNITY FARM ↗
- Who funds CONSTITUTING AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds American College of Pediatricians ↗
- Who funds The Charlemagne Institute ↗
- Who funds CHEQUAMEGON AREA MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATI ↗
- Who funds PERSPECTIVES INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZEN JOURNALISM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Minneapolis Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Michael J & Karen B Frey Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Mick and Sandy Lee Family Foundation · The Mark E and Mary a Davis Foundation · Bieber Family Foundation · Robins Kaplan Foundation · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · Donors Trust Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pine Rock Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pine Rock Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Pine Rock Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.