Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Michael F McManus Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$491k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.3MAnimals$906kHuman Services$695kYouth Development$343kReligion$115kHealth$91kHousing & Shelter$24kRecreation & Sports$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $137k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $301k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPARKLE$100,000
MAKE A DIFFERENCE RESCUE$91,000
RACQUET UP DETROIT$60,000
WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$50,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
ANGELS PLACE$20,000
HOLY ANGELS SCHOOL FOUNDATION$20,000
LIFELINE CHILDRENS SERVICES$15,000
THE CRU FOUNDATION$12,000
ST MARY CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BLUE STARSERVICE DOGS$10,000
CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY$10,000
MICHIGAN ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE$5,000
THE HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $652k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BLUE STARSERVICE DOGS: $10k → 5%THE HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $5k → 8%THE HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $5k → 8%THE HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $5k → 8%THE HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $5k → 8%THE HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $5k → 8%THE HOUSE OF PROIDENCE: $3k → 21%THE HOUSE OF PROIDENCE: $3k → 21%THE HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $5k → 8%THE HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $3k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $1k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $500 → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $500 → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $500 → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $510k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $21k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $20k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $20k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $8k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $5k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $5k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $3k → 8%ANGELS PLACE: $1k → 8%THE JUDSON CENTER: $5k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $3k → 8%JUDSON CENTER: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
AZ
KS
TN
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.3M · 40 repeat orgs$219k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
27

Total granted

$3.3M
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+31%

Still filing today

45%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $148k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsEducationReligionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    Make A Difference Rescue Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $887k · revenue +511% · 72% of their budget
  • AP
    ANGELS' PLACE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $592k · revenue +84%
  • RU
    RACQUET UP DETROIT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $343k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHRIST CHURCH CRANBROOK
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • IC
    InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • FW
    FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
2
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
3
Noah Project

Noah project is a no-kill animal shelter dedicated to the rescue of abused, abandoned and unwanted animals. its mission is to not allow a healthy, adoptable dog or cat that is accepted at the center to be destroyed.

Animals
4
Organ Procurement Agency of Michigan

We honor life through donation.

5
Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
Health
6
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
7
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

8
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

9
The New Foster Care

The new foster care will show the love of jesus christ by making a measurable, meaningful, and transformative change in the michigan foster care system and in the lives of those who have experienced foster care by: 1) providing direct…

Human Services
10
Brilliant Detroit

Helping families and neighborhoods succeed by providing a place and support to assure kids ages 0-5 are school ready and families are healthy and stable.

Youth Development
11
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
12
Friends of Michigan Animals Rescue

Friends of michigan animals rescue's mission is to protect animals and residents by promoting a safe and healthy environment for all.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFamily FoundationsLocal Heritage & Parks Pres…Animal Rescue and WelfareYouth Development ProgramsTrade Union Funds and Assoc…Faith-Based Community Servi…Detroit Education Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%3%<5yr13%9%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr15%9%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr18%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%4%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%49%10–20yr15%35%20–35yr14%7%35–55yr18%6%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
12%
6,511/53,818

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
22/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST MARY CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL — $115,000 · OtherST MARY CATHOLIC CENTRAL HIGH…SOUTHFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $101,740 · OtherSOUTHFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOLHOLY ANGELS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $95,500 · OtherHOLY ANGELS SCHOOLS FOUNDATIO…Individual grant recipient — $95,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CRU FOUNDATION — $69,600 · OtherTHE CRU FOUNDATIONMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION — $54,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATIONMICHIGAN ELITE 25 — $40,000 · OtherCHRIST CHILD SOCIETY — $39,500 · OtherCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER — $34,500 · Other+34 more — $182,517 · Other+34 moreMake A Difference Rescue Inc — $887,293 · AnimalsMake A Difference Rescue Inc+3 more — $8,575 · AnimalsANGELS' PLACE — $591,500 · Human ServicesANGELS' PLACEHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE — $37,500 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF PROVIDENCEMARY'S MANTLE — $24,000 · Human Services+5 more — $47,000 · Human Services+5 moreWestside Christian Academy — $391,150 · EducationWestside Chris…Eton Academy — $33,500 · EducationEton Academy+2 more — $7,500 · EducationRACQUET UP DETROIT — $342,500 · Recreation & SportsRACQUET UP …+1 more — $500 · Recreation & SportsSparklefaith Inc — $100,000 · ReligionLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $25,000 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA — $10,000 · ReligionMother and Unborn Baby Care Inc — $22,000 · HealthPenrickton Center for Blind Children — $17,000 · HealthSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER — $7,500 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $2,500 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $2,000 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $2,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · Health
Other$917,357Animals$895,868Human Services$700,000Education$432,150Recreation & Sports$343,000Religion$135,000Health$53,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMake A Difference Rescue Inc — $887,293 over 9y, 72% of budgetANGELS' PLACE — $591,500 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetWestside Christian Academy — $391,150 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetRACQUET UP DETROIT — $342,500 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE — $37,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetEton Academy — $33,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARY'S MANTLE — $24,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetMother and Unborn Baby Care Inc — $22,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetPenrickton Center for Blind Children — $17,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJUDSON CENTER INC — $12,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKING — $10,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBLUE STAR SERVICE DOGS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFAITH WORKS MICHIGAN — $7,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICAH 6 COMMUNITY — $5,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT DOG RESCUE — $1,575 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRebel Dogs Detroit Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOTTOMLESS TOY CHEST INC — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Make A Difference Rescue Inc
  • Who funds ANGELS' PLACE
  • Who funds Westside Christian Academy
  • Who funds RACQUET UP DETROIT
  • Who funds Sparklefaith Inc
  • Who funds HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE
  • Who funds Eton Academy
  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
  • Who funds MARY'S MANTLE
  • Who funds Mother and Unborn Baby Care Inc
  • Who funds Penrickton Center for Blind Children
  • Who funds JUDSON CENTER INC
  • Who funds HOPE AGAINST TRAFFICKING
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
  • Who funds BLUE STAR SERVICE DOGS INC
  • Who funds FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds MICHIGAN ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI22.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Barton Malow Foundation · Catholic Foundation of Michigan · Eagles for Children · Canton Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Mihalich Charitable Foundation · Seizert Family Foundation · Somerset Collection Charitable Foundation · Lula C Wilson Trust Xxxxx3003 · Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memorial · The Kresge Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Michael F McManus Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph