Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Michael and Nina Stanton Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$212k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$79k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$660kInternational$258kHealth$35kHuman Services$31kEducation$22kEnvironment$21kCivil Rights$14kAnimals$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $39k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $134k
$4,600
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARAMOUR CENTER FOR MUSIC AND THE ARTS$78,600
UNICEF$55,800
OLD FRIENDS AT CABIN CREEK$15,500
FRACTURED ATLAS$12,000
NORTHERN WESCHESTER HOSPITAL$11,180
THE NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN$5,900
SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATION FUND - UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$5,000
BEDFORD PLAYHOUSE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,600
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$4,000
ZENO MOUNTAIN FARM$3,600
UNIVERSITY OF MASS AMHERST$2,500
MIANUS RIVER GORGE INC$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$2,000
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS$1,940
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KOWITZ FAMILY FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%ONE SIGHT: $1k → 6%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $250 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$936k · 22 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
41

Total granted

$936k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+26%

Still filing today

55%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    7× · 2018–2024 · $243k · revenue +47%
  • FRACTURED ATLAS INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $120k · revenue +57%
  • BP
    BEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $23k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PERFORMANCE ZONE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $45k · revenue +62%
  • MC
    METRO CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +236%
  • WC
    WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
4
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Dutchess Land Conservancy Inc

Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…

Environment
10
New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…

Arts & Culture
11
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
12
New York Landmarks Conservancy Inc

The conservancy preserves and revitalizes new york's architecture. by doing so, it contributes to new york's economy, tourism and quality of life.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kowitz Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
24/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Caramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc: $387,300 · Arts & CultureCaramoor Center for Music & the Arts IncFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $119,500 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INCMETRO CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INCORPORATED: $30,000 · Arts & CultureBEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC: $22,690 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $34,008 · Arts & Culture+2 moreUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $242,575 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNI…+3 more: $9,950 · InternationalTHE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC: $45,000 · OtherTHE PERFORMANCE ZON…OLD FRIENDS AT CABIN CREEK: $30,500 · OtherOLD FRIENDS AT CABI…FLHSA: $15,000 · OtherFLHSAUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSA…NORTHERN WESCHESTER HOSPITAL: $13,360 · OtherNORTHERN WESCHESTER…UNIVERSITY OF MASS AMHERST: $7,500 · Other+41 more: $57,541 · Other+41 moreCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC: $13,400 · Civil RightsNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10,720 · EnvironmentWAVE HILL INCORPORATED: $2,100 · Environment+2 more: $500 · EnvironmentWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $7,750 · AnimalsMIANUS RIVER GORGE INC: $4,600 · AnimalsFOX LANE HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Education
Arts & Culture$593,498International$252,525Other$183,901Civil Rights$13,400Environment$13,320Animals$12,350Education$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCaramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc: $387,300 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $242,575 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $119,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC: $45,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC: $22,690 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $18,108 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC: $15,900 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC: $13,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $10,720 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $7,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTibet Fund Inc: $5,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGABRIELLE'S ANGEL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOX LANE HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetMIANUS RIVER GORGE INC: $4,600 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAVE HILL INCORPORATED: $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFUTURE 5 INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOneSight: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeals-on-Wheels of New Rochelle Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HELICON FOUNDATION INC: $650 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEW YORK EDGE INC: $531 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMORELAND SANCTUARY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATIONINC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Caramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds METRO CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds BEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds WOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Tibet Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds GABRIELLE'S ANGEL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds FOX LANE HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MIANUS RIVER GORGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds KOWITZ FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WAVE HILL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE 5 INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds OneSight ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY17.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Ibm International Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Michael and Nina Stanton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Michael and Nina Stanton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Whale and Dolphin Conservationinc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michael and Nina Stanton’s filings →

More from the funding graph