Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Merrill Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.6M
Granted FY2022
45
Grants FY2022
6
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$2.5MEnvironment$1.1MArts & Culture$860kFood & Nutrition$680kInternational$671kRecreation & Sports$452kHealth$135kPublic Benefit$130kOther$0
02FY2022 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 45 grants below total $3,922,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,622,900 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $700,700 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k10 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $330k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
$30,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cornell University$1,520,000
JDRF International Inc.$245,600
Friends of Mitchell Park, DC$225,000
Capital Area Food Bank$200,000
Ford's Theatre$200,000
International Towing and Recovery Survivors Fund$150,000
Chesapeake Bay Trust$150,000
News Literacy Project$105,000
Shelburne Farms$100,000
Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay$100,000
Trust for National Mall$100,000
Memorial International Center$90,000
Girl Scouts of the Green and White$65,000
University of Maryland Foundation$50,000
Anacostia Watershed Society$50,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 22 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
14

Total granted

$4.7M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+59%

Still filing today

77%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $987k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22
EducationEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Cornell University
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2.0M · revenue +46%
  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $425k · revenue +39%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $236k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $600k · revenue -6%
  • LC
    LAKE CHAMPLAIN COMMUNITY SAILING CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $205k · revenue +102%
  • JH
    Johns Hopkins University Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $150k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
2
Harry R Hughes Center for Agro-Ecology

The Center brings together diverse interests from the agricultural, forestry, and environmental communities for the purpose of retaining Maryland's working landscapes and the industries they support while protecting and improving the…

Food & Nutrition
3
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
4
Medstar Health Inc

Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.

Health
5
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
6
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

7
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
8
Maryland Independent College & University Association Inc

Serving the interests of independent higher education and supporting the work of campus leaders throughout the state of maryland.

9
The Center for Conservation Biology

Mission statement: our mission is to provide the global community with the information needed to drive thoughtful, science-based conservation, to educate and train the next generation of conservation scientists, and to make lasting…

Environment
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chesapeake Bay Trust and the most unlike its peers is Building Bridges. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Charter and Independent Sch…Domestic Violence and Sexua…Community Hospital SystemsDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Theater CompaniesGovernment Accountability &…Local History MuseumsCollege Foundation SupportFood Pantries and AssistanceEnvironmental Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr14%4%20–35yr15%40%35–55yr15%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%5%10–20yr14%1%20–35yr15%27%35–55yr15%67%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
6,446/50,441

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
23/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Cornell University — $2,037,000 · EducationCornell UniversityUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $235,600 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INCLAKE CHAMPLAIN COMMUNITY SAILING CENTER INC — $205,000 · EducationLAKE CHAMPLAIN COMMUNITY SAILING CENTER INCTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC — $130,000 · Education+1 more — $35,000 · EducationJDRF International Inc. — $245,600 · OtherJDRF International Inc.Friends of Mitchell Park, DC — $227,000 · OtherFriends of Mitchell Park, DCTrust for National Mall — $180,000 · OtherTrust for National MallInternational Towing and Recovery Survivors Fund — $155,000 · OtherInternational Towing and Recovery …CHESAPEAKE BAY TRUST — $150,000 · OtherCHESAPEAKE BAY TRUSTJohns Hopkins University Foundation — $150,000 · OtherJohns Hopkins University Foundatio…THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $103,000 · OtherShelburne Farms — $100,000 · OtherANNAPOLIS MARITIME MUSEUM INC — $95,000 · OtherMemorial International Center — $90,000 · Other+29 more — $581,800 · Other+29 moreCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $600,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BAY …ALLIANCE FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY INC — $130,000 · EnvironmentALLIANCE FOR TH…CHESAPEAKE LEGAL ALLIANCE INC — $90,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE LEGA…ANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY INC — $90,000 · EnvironmentANACOSTIA WATER…+1 more — $10,000 · EnvironmentFORD'S THEATRE SOCIETY — $450,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN COUNCIL OF TRUSTEES AND ALUMNI — $60,000 · Arts & CultureCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $425,000 · Food & NutritionVERMONT FOODBANK — $20,000 · Food & NutritionFREEDOM HOUSE — $150,000 · InternationalMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER — $30,000 · InternationalCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $70,000 · HealthLUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER INC — $30,000 · HealthCommunity Crisis Services Inc — $15,000 · HealthAUTISM SOCIETY OF MARYLAND INC — $12,000 · Health
Education$2,642,600Other$2,077,400Environment$920,000Arts & Culture$510,000Food & Nutrition$445,000International$180,000Health$127,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCornell University — $2,037,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $600,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFORD'S THEATRE SOCIETY — $450,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $425,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $235,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLAKE CHAMPLAIN COMMUNITY SAILING CENTER INC — $205,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY TRUST — $150,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE — $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY INC — $130,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC — $130,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $103,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANNAPOLIS MARITIME MUSEUM INC — $95,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetCHESAPEAKE LEGAL ALLIANCE INC — $90,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY INC — $90,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $70,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetTHE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN COUNCIL OF TRUSTEES AND ALUMNI — $60,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMARET SCHOOL INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Barker Adoption Foundation — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUMINIS HEALTH ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Crisis Services Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF MARYLAND INC — $12,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetBuilding Bridges — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetUpstream Alliance Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFEDERAL CITY COUNCIL — $4,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC20.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Chesapeake Bay Trust · Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Give Back Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Ibm International Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Merrill Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Merrill Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $4.2M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph