Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mercy Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$165kHuman Services$43kReligion$40kPhilanthropy$30kEducation$23kInternational$15kYouth Development$15kHousing & Shelter$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEPS OF FAITH$30,000
SAC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%BUTTERFLY FOUNDATION: $5k → 20%ELKO FRIENDS IN SERVICE HELPING: $5k → 9%ABLE YOUTH: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NV
CO
MO
KY
KS
TN
NC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$282k · 10 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
16

Total granted

$282k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
0%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    STEPS OF FAITH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $68k · revenue +391%
  • SA
    SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER
    4× · 2017–2023 · $43k · revenue +97%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $35k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • HH
    HELPING HANDS
    one grant, 2023 · $37k
  • LM
    LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES OF ANTIOCH TN INC
    one grant, 2017 · $23k
  • SJ
    ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rahab House

Rahab House is deeply committed to the rescue, refuge, and restoration of human trafficking survivors. We provide comprehensive support that encompasses immediate safety and connections to long-term restorative care in alignment with the…

Human Services
2
Second Chances Foundation Inc

Providing safe affordable alcohol-free and drug-free housing to clients in rehabilitation in the memphis tn regional community.

Housing & Shelter
3
Calvary Rescue Mission

Calvary rescue mission is a haven for the homeless in memphis. for all time, it has been to reach out and minister to the needs of each person regardless of race, color, or creed. we furnish a clean shower, clothing, bed, along with the…

Human Services
4
Street Hope Tn

Street hope tn is a faith-based non-profit with a mission to eliminate sexual exploitation and trafficking of children and provide a safe environment to foster healing and hope through jesus christ. this mission is fulfilled through…

Recreation & Sports
5
Nashville Safe Haven Family Shelter Inc

Lead our community's efforts to house, support, empower and advocate for families experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
6
Rescue Hill Nazarene Compassionate Ministry Center

Rescue Hill helps survivors of human trafficking with recovery services and resources in a safe environment. Rescue Hill offers a stabilization home for survivors and their small children as well as advocacy services.

Human Services
7
Hope Street Ministry Inc

Hope street provides housing and healing to men, women, and children whose lives have been profoundly affected by the toxic environment they grew up in, their own choices, or drug and alcohol abuse. empowered by the active grace of christ,…

Health
8
Hope Ministries of Northern Kentucky Inc

Hope ministries helps low income families in northern kentucky with emergency food assistance, clothing, household items, and used toys.

Human Services
9
Greater Chattanooga Christian Services Inc

Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling

Human Services
10
Scarlet Hope Nashville

To share the hope and love of Jesus with women in the adult entertainment industry

—
11
Selah Life Choices Inc

We exist to serve women who have been trafficked. through our confidential services, we offer a safe space for healing to begin while we compassionately reflect jesus to all we encounter.

Human Services
12
Refuge of Hope Ministries

Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Summit County Rescue Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAC: $55,000 · OtherSACHELPING HANDS: $37,087 · OtherHELPING HANDSAGAPE: $35,000 · OtherAGAPELIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES OF ANTIOCH TN INC: $23,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE MINISTRIES OF ANTIOCH TN INCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF: $20,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OFFILTER OF HOPE INC: $15,000 · OtherFILTER OF HOPE INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $15,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH+10 more: $42,000 · Other+10 moreSTEPS OF FAITH FOUNDATION: $67,500 · HealthSTEPS OF FAITH FOUNDATIONSEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER: $42,500 · HealthSEXUAL ASSAULT CENTERST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL IN…THE BUTTERFLY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesElko FISH: $5,000 · Human ServicesAble Youth Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterYOUTH ENCOURAGEMENT SERVICES INC: $1,200 · Youth Development
Other$242,087Health$145,000Human Services$12,000Philanthropy$10,000Housing & Shelter$2,500Youth Development$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEPS OF FAITH FOUNDATION: $67,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER: $42,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFILTER OF HOPE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BUTTERFLY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSUMMIT COUNTY RESCUE GROUP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetST JOHN CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetElko FISH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH ENCOURAGEMENT SERVICES INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAble Youth Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOPE HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEPS OF FAITH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FILTER OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BUTTERFLY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT COUNTY RESCUE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Elko FISH ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ENCOURAGEMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Able Youth Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nashville Predators FoundationTN13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nashville Predators Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mercy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mercy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mercy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph