Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Melly Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$124k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$2.6MScience & Tech$533kHealth$456kReligion$390kHuman Services$248kFood & Nutrition$170kEnvironment$103kArts & Culture$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $178k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $823k
$2,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY COLLEGE$123,563
THE SALVATION ARMY$100,000
ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK$100,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$100,000
SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$100,000
MOTE MARINE LABORATORY$100,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$100,000
SMITH COLLEGE$99,167
THE HILL SCHOOL$25,000
HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA$22,500
THE BERRY CENTER$20,000
KENT SCHOOL$19,868
SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL FETAL MEDICINE$13,000
HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES$13,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 20%THE FAMILY CENTER: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MI
NY
MA
WY
PA
NJ
CT
KY
VA
NM
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.8M · 35 repeat orgs$684k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
41

Total granted

$3.8M
$658k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-14%

Still filing today

74%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES
    4× · 2020–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +74%
  • MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $529k · revenue +67%
  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $199k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • HC
    HOBART COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • TH
    THE HILL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • SC
    SMITH COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Greenwich Land Trust Inc and the most unlike its peers is Greenwich Point Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Cancer Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsPolicy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%1%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%58%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES — $1,366,852 · EducationHOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGESTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $199,167 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGETRINITY COLLEGE — $159,606 · EducationTRINITY COLLEGETHE HILL SCHOOL — $100,000 · EducationKENT SCHOOL — $66,868 · Education+6 more — $68,750 · EducationMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC — $529,300 · OtherMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INCFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $387,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHHOBART COLLEGE — $250,250 · OtherHOBART COLLEGETHE SALVATION ARMY — $180,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHE HILL SCHOOL — $150,000 · OtherTHE HILL SCHOOLSMITH COLLEGE — $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA — $72,500 · Other+50 more — $229,650 · Other+50 moreSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $405,000 · HealthSARASOTA ME…PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Health+3 more — $22,500 · HealthALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $130,000 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL — $36,000 · EnvironmentWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO — $10,000 · EnvironmentGREENWICH POINT CONSERVANCY INC — $2,500 · EnvironmentTHE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC — $2,500 · Environment+1 more — $1,000 · EnvironmentTHE FAMILY CENTER INC — $24,000 · Human ServicesCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER — $6,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Education$1,961,243Other$1,899,200Health$447,500Food & Nutrition$130,000Environment$52,000Human Services$24,000Philanthropy$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES — $1,366,852 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC — $529,300 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $405,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $199,167 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE — $159,606 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $130,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL — $100,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKENT SCHOOL — $66,868 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BERRY CENTER INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL — $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY CENTER INC — $24,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew College Foundation Inc — $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Family Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO — $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University — $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN BRIDGE PARK CORPORATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH POINT CONSERVANCY INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF GREENWICH CONN INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetElkhorn Marine Conservancy Inc — $2,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY CENTERS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF DUANE PARK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTIDEWELL FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC
  • Who funds SARASOTA MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL
  • Who funds KENT SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE BERRY CENTER INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE FAMILY CENTER INC
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE
  • Who funds New College Foundation Inc
  • Who funds The Family Center Inc
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Melly Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution63% of income from government
  • Family Centers Inc20% of income from government
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc4% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College1% of income from government
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College1% of income from government
  • Trinity College0% of income from government
  • The Family Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph