Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mdbsd Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$198k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$613kRecreation & Sports$115kHuman Services$85kYouth Development$45kFood & Nutrition$39kHealth$34kEducation$18kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRONCO ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION$100,000
CAPTIVATE CHURCH$30,000
ROCK POINT CHURCH$25,000
FEEDING SAN DIEGO$20,000
BOYS TO MEN MENTORING$15,000
BRIDGE OF HOPE$5,000
MIRACLE EAR FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ADOPT TOGETHER: $10k → 6%YMCA OF SAN DIEGO: $3k → 11%YMCA OF SAN DIEGO: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
IA
OH
NJ
CA
AZ
HI
OK
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$629k · 16 repeat orgs$327k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +103% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
23

Total granted

$629k
$177k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+103%
+18%

Still filing today

38%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    Boys to Men Mentoring Network Inc
    7× · 2018–2025 · $43k · revenue +145%
  • CS
    CURA SMILES INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +429%
  • JC
    JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK
    4× · 2020–2023 · $19k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • NC
    NEWBREAK CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • NH
    NEW HOPE OAHU
    one grant, 2020 · $24k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
6
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
7
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
8
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
9
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
10
Mission Mutual

Equipping mission, ministry, and philanthropic organizations (of similar vision) with the organizational and relational perspective needed to accelerate and enhance their collective impact. mission mutual exists to provide centralized…

International
11
Alliance for Childhood Diseases

To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.

Health
12
Connectree

Connectree's vision is to help missionaries have the care and support they need, financially, physically, emotionally and spiritually, to carry out the ministry that god has called them to do. our 5 distinctives are: missionary care,…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding San Diego; the most unlike its peers is Miracle-Ear Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLEGE AVE BAPSTIST CHURCH: $165,000 · OtherCOLLEGE AVE BAPSTIST CHURCHMAKERS CHURCH: $160,000 · OtherMAKERS CHURCHCAPTIVATE CHURCH: $90,000 · OtherCAPTIVATE CHURCHNEWBREAK CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherNEWBREAK CHURCHVFW: $37,250 · OtherTHE VERTICAL CHURCH: $35,000 · OtherROCK POINT CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherNEW HOPE OAHU: $23,730 · Other+24 more: $125,701 · Other+24 moreBronco Athletic Association Inc: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsBronco Athl…Boys to Men Mentoring Network Inc: $43,200 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $20,000 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $18,500 · Food & NutritionCURA SMILES INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyMIRACLE-EAR FOUNDATION: $7,500 · PhilanthropyHOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $6,000 · Human ServicesASELTINE SCHOOL: $12,000 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · Health
Other$711,681Recreation & Sports$100,000Youth Development$44,700Food & Nutrition$38,500Philanthropy$32,500Human Services$16,000Education$12,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBronco Athletic Association Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBoys to Men Mentoring Network Inc: $43,200 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCURA SMILES INC: $25,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $18,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASELTINE SCHOOL: $12,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMIRACLE-EAR FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFILTER OF HOPE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bronco Athletic Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boys to Men Mentoring Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds CURA SMILES INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ASELTINE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE-EAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds FILTER OF HOPE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mdbsd Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mdbsd Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mdbsd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph