Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McKinney Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$232k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$213kEducation$210kHealth$173kPhilanthropy$125kHousing & Shelter$43kInternational$23kFood & Nutrition$15kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $207k
$14,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMPOWER SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA$40,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
UNITED WAY$25,000
MITCHELL'S PLACE$25,000
UAB VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS$20,000
A PLUS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$17,500
BIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS$15,000
WOMENS FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA$15,000
Individual grant recipient$14,000
ALABAMA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$10,000
PROSPER FOUNDATION$5,000
BIRMINGHAM PROMISE$5,000
YOUTHSERVE$5,000
ADVENT EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$5,000
UNLESS U$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RYKER'S RAINBOW: $10k → 11%RYKER'S RAINBOW: $3k → 11%RYKER'S RAINBOW: $3k → 11%KULTURE CITY: $10k → 16%KULTURE CITY: $10k → 16%KULTURE CITY: $10k → 16%KULTURE CITY: $10k → 16%UNLESS U: $3k → 16%UNLESS U: $3k → 16%UNLESS U: $3k → 16%UNLESS U: $3k → 16%PROSPER FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 19 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
10

Total granted

$1.0M
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

58%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    EMPOWER SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $150k · revenue +310%
  • MP
    MITCHELL'S PLACE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $130k · revenue +20%
  • UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $85k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BIRMINGHAM
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • S
    Sidewalkgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $43k · revenue ×28
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Breakthrough Birmingham

Breakthrough Birmingham works with highly motivated, traditionally underrepresented students in Alabama to achieve post-secondary success while empowering aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educators and advocates.

Education
2
Innovate Birmingham

Innovate birmingham is a nonprofit organization working to promote economic mobility and fill the tech talent gap in central alabama.

Employment
3
Alabama Possible

To partner with higher-education and faith-based organizations to strengthen awareness about poverty and its causes while advocating for fact-based policy decisions statewide.

Human Services
4
Peoples Budget Birmingham

Our mission is to empower people across Birmingham through community education and organizing, ensuring neighborhoods have direct and democratic control over local resources and municipal spending while holding our government accountable…

Community Improvement
5
Create Birmingham

To support workforce development, entrepreneurial ventures and job growth in non-profit and commercial creative industries.

Philanthropy
6
The Arc of Alabama Inc

The arc of alabama provides services to advocate and aid individuals with cognitive, intellectual, and developmental disabilities in the state of alabama.

—
7
Redemptive Cycles Services Inc

The mission is to make birmingham, al a more connected, comfortable and livable city through the use of bicycles. bicycles are affordable transportation which fight traffic congestion and pollution in the city center while boosting health…

Recreation & Sports
8
The Birmingham Foundation
—
9
Build Up

Empower youth to step out of generational poverty and tackle urban blight by earning the education, workforce skills, and multi-family homeownership to collectively lead long-term community revitalization.

Youth Development
10
Urban Impact Inc

Our mission is to develop, implement and drive creative community-based strategies and programs that enhance economic opportunity, builds inclusive and equitable ecosystems, facilitates historic preservation, and ensures a dynamic,…

Philanthropy
11
Birmingham Regional Empowerment and Development

The organization creates educational opportunities and programs that will provide additional support for preservation and development. the organization will achieve its mission through enhancement, effective asset management,…

Education
12
Stair of Birmingham

The organization's exempt purpose is to provide educational assistanceto birmingham city schools' children through an after school readingprogram.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Empower Schools of Alabama; the most unlike its peers is Sidewalk. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRED MOUNTAIN THEATER: $115,000 · OtherRED MOUNTAIN THEATERALABAMA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $72,500 · OtherALABAMA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAA PLUS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $62,500 · OtherA PLUS EDUCATION FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $56,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BIRMINGHAM: $50,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BIRMINGHAMUAB VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS: $45,000 · OtherUAB VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTSSidewalk: $42,500 · OtherSidewalk+8 more: $72,500 · Other+8 moreEMPOWER SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA: $150,000 · EducationEMPOWER SCHOOLS …Birmingham Promise Inc: $15,000 · EducationBirmingham Promi…BUILDING PEACE INC: $7,500 · EducationMITCHELL'S PLACE INC: $130,000 · HealthMITCHELL'S PL…THE RED BARN: $15,000 · HealthTHE RED BARN+1 more: $2,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $85,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA: $30,000 · PhilanthropyWOMEN'S FOU…THE PENNY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyKultureCity: $40,000 · Human ServicesRYKERS RAINBOW: $15,000 · Human ServicesUNLESS U INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesPROSPER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsYOUTHSERVE INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentSIBYL TEMPLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$636,000Education$172,500Health$147,000Philanthropy$120,000Human Services$70,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Youth Development$20,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMPOWER SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA: $150,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetMITCHELL'S PLACE INC: $130,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKultureCity: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS: $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetYOUTHSERVE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetBirmingham Promise Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRYKERS RAINBOW: $15,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetTHE RED BARN: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUNLESS U INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBUILDING PEACE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PENNY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRIORY IN THE USA OF THE MOST VENERABLE ORDER OF THE HOSP / ST JOHN OF JERUSALEM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIBYL TEMPLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMPOWER SCHOOLS OF ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds MITCHELL'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Sidewalk ↗
  • Who funds KultureCity ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds BIG CITY MOUNTAINEERS ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHSERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Birmingham Promise Inc ↗
  • Who funds RYKERS RAINBOW ↗
  • Who funds THE RED BARN ↗
  • Who funds UNLESS U INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROSPER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE PENNY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRIORY IN THE USA OF THE MOST VENERABLE ORDER OF THE HOSP / ST JOHN OF JERUSALEM ↗
  • Who funds SIBYL TEMPLE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Greater BirminghamAL23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Protective Life Foundation · Altecstyslinger Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Hugh Kaul Foundation · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · The Hackney Foundation · Better Place Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McKinney Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McKinney Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McKinney’s filings →

    More from the funding graph