Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McCaddin-McQuirk Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$404k
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
22
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$1.5MEducation$324kInternational$37kFood & Nutrition$27kHuman Services$5kYouth Development$3k
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $215k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $189k
$7,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLENMARY HOME MISSIONERS$17,500
ST JOSEPH'S SEMINARY AND COLLAGE$14,000
CATHOLICE ARCHDIOCESE OF KUMASI$14,000
REDEMPTORIS MATER ARCHIDIOCESAN MISSIONARY SEMINARY$14,000
SAINT BENEDICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION$14,000
CATHOLIC EXTENSION$10,500
ST MICHAEL'S ABBEY$10,500
REDEMPTORIST FATHERS BRAZIL MISSION$10,500
CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE$10,500
PONTIFICAL NORTH AMERICAN COLLEGE$10,500
MILL HILL MISSIONARIES$10,500
NOTRE DAME SEMINARY$10,500
FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE$10,500
THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE$10,500
DIVINE WORD COLLEGE$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 89% of grant dollars ($1.7M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 11% that went abroad ($205k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SAINT BENEDICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $14k → 10%THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $11k → 10%ST MICHAEL'S ABBEY: $11k → 10%DIOCESE OF GALLUP: $15k → 32%PONTIFICAL NORTH AMERICAN COLLEGE: $11k → 14%CATHOLIC EXTENSION: $11k → 10%DIVINE WORD COLLEGE: $11k → 11%SAINT BENEDICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $14k → 17%CONGREGATION OF THE MISSION WESTERN PROVINCE: $11k → 21%GLENMARY HOME MISSIONERS: $18k → 16%FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $11k → 19%CATHOLIC EXTENSION: $11k → 14%REDEMPTORIS MATER ARCHIDIOCESAN MISSIONARY SEMINARY: $14k → 14%CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE: $11k → 10%NOTRE DAME SEMINARY: $11k → 23%SAINT BENEDICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $12k → 10%THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $11k → 10%ST MICHAEL'S ABBEY: $11k → 10%DIOCESE OF GALLUP: $11k → 32%PONTIFICAL NORTH AMERICAN COLLEGE: $11k → 14%CATHOLIC EXTENSION: $11k → 10%DIVINE WORD COLLEGE: $11k → 11%SAINT BENEDICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $14k → 17%GLENMARY HOME MISSIONERS: $18k → 16%FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $11k → 19%REDEMPTORIS MATER ARCHIDIOCESAN MISSIONARY SEMINARY: $14k → 14%CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE: $11k → 10%NOTRE DAME SEMINARY: $11k → 23%THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $11k → 10%ST MICHAEL'S ABBEY: $11k → 10%DIOCESE OF GALLUP: $11k → 32%PONTIFICAL NORTH AMERICAN COLLEGE: $11k → 14%DIVINE WORD COLLEGE: $11k → 11%GLENMARY HOME MISSIONERS: $18k → 16%FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $11k → 19%REDEMPTORIS MATER ARCHIDIOCESAN MISSIONARY SEMINARY: $14k → 14%GLENMARY HOME MISSIONERS: $15k → 16%REDEMPTONS MATER ARCHIDIOCESAN MISSIONARY SEMINARY: $12k → 14%GLENMARY HOME MISSIONERS: $13k → 16%MILL HILL MISSIONARIES: $21k → 9%GLENMARY HOME MISSIONERS: $13k → 16%MILL HILL MISSIONARIES: $21k → 9%MILL HILL MISSIONARIES: $18k → 9%MILL HILL MISSIONARIES: $15k → 9%MILL HILL MISSIONARIES: $15k → 9%ST JOSEPH'S SEMINARY AND COLLAGE: $14k → 9%ST JOSEPH'S SEMINARY AND COLLAGE: $14k → 9%ST JOSEPH'S SEMINARY AND COLLAGE: $14k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
NM
DC
LA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 11% of all-years giving ($205k)

7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Brazil$56k · 6 grants
Ghana$47k · 4 grants
Kenya$37k · 5 grants
Philippines$30k · 4 grants
Austria$15k · 5 grants
Uganda$10k · 1 grant
Ireland$10k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 55 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
7

Total granted

$1.9M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+16%

Still filing today

7%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CHRISTENDOM EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $56k · revenue +81%
  • TA
    THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $51k · revenue +58%
  • FU
    FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $41k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • DM
    DOMINICAN MISSION SECRETARIATE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • MO
    MISSIONARIES OF JESUS THE DEVINE MASTER
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF ST MONICA
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILL HILL MISSIONARIES: $100,500 · OtherMILL HILL MISSIONARIESHOME MISSIONERS OF AMERICA: $92,500 · OtherREDEMPTORIS MATER ARCHIDIOCESAN MISSIONARY SEMINARY: $63,000 · Other+59 more: $1,490,000 · Other+59 moreCHRISTENDOM EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION: $55,500 · EducationTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $50,500 · EducationFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $40,500 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationINTERNATIONAL DOMINICAN FOUNDATION: $37,000 · ReligionCanons Regular of Jesus The Lord of Nevada Inc: $7,000 · Religion
Other$1,746,000Education$149,000Religion$44,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTENDOM EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION: $55,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $50,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $40,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOMINICAN FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRISTENDOM EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOMINICAN FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Koch Foundation IncFL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Koch Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McCaddin-McQuirk Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McCaddin-McQuirk Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The McCaddin-McQuirk Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The McCaddin-McQuirk Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McCaddin-McQuirk’s filings →

    More from the funding graph