Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Max and Bella Stein Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2020
34
Grants FY2020
5
States reached
$290k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

82% of The Max and Bella Stein Charitable Trust’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Max and Bella Stein Charitable Trust named its own grantees at scale: 18 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

18
20
13
21
16
22
13
23
16
24
9
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

International$3.6MEducation$854kPhilanthropy$516kReligion$479kAnimals$182kArts & Culture$73kHealth$63kScience & Tech$60kOther$0
02FY2020 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k9 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $258k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $480k
  • $250k+1 grant · $290k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACK BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMY$290,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$200,000
GERMANTOWN JEWISH CENTER$170,000
TEMPLE BETH HILLEL$60,000
MUHLENBERG COLLEGE$50,000
ADATH ISRAEL$30,000
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$20,000
STRATFORD SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL AMERICA$20,000
CEASE FIRE PA$17,500
Individual grant recipient$16,000
HAPPY HEART-HAPPY HOME FARM & RESCUE$14,560
OHEV SHALOM OF BUCKS COUNTY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MARION & AARON GURAL JCC: $11k → 6%FRIENDS OF BET ELAKRAKI: $1k → 7%THE LIGHTHOUSE: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 28 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2020, 11 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
53

Total granted

$1.7M
$353k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+4%

Still filing today

57%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    JACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $436k · revenue +28%
  • KF
    Karuna Foundation
    4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +94%
  • HH
    HAPPY HEART-HAPPY HOME FARM AND RESCUE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $72k · revenue +408%

Funded once

  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH HILLEL
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +44%
  • TC
    THE COUNCIL FOR CANADIAN AMERICAN RELATIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +89%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hillel Jewish University Center

To enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

2
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
3
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life At the Penn State University

To enrich the lives of jewish and undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. penn state hillel's student leaders, professionals, and lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming, and…

4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
6
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

7
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
8
Camp Ramah in the Poconos

Camp ramah's mission is to create a nurturing, safe, fun-filled, vibrant jewish community that inspires the education, social, cultural, moral, physical, and emotional growth of campers and staff, fostering life-long jewish identity. ramah…

Recreation & Sports
9
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
10
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
11
Israel-America Academic Exchange

Israel-america academic exchange (iaae) is a nonprofit organization whose mission is todeepen the understanding of israel and the middle east within the international academiccommunity. the organization organizes educational missions and…

International
12
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Jewish Food Ethics and the most unlike its peers is Happy Heart-Happy Home Farm and Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Dance Arts OrganizationsJewish Community Organizati…Animal Rescue and ShelterFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts CentersEquine Therapy Programs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%13%<5yr13%13%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr15%16%35–55yr17%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr13%3%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr17%2%20–35yr15%10%35–55yr17%78%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/49
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,113

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/44
Grantees still filing
28/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $3,568,406 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INCJACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMY — $436,000 · OtherJACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACAD…GERMANTOWN JEWISH CENTRE — $229,400 · OtherGERMANTOWN JEWISH CENTREADATH ISRAEL — $109,132 · OtherADATH ISRAELJGIVE — $81,250 · OtherJGIVESCHECTER INSTITUTE — $60,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH HILLEL — $60,000 · OtherBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $53,000 · Other+54 more — $388,868 · Other+54 moreVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $387,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $40,000 · PhilanthropyMUHLENBERG COLLEGE — $324,000 · EducationLIVE LIKE BLAINE FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $16,000 · Education+5 more — $29,000 · EducationKaruna Foundation — $80,000 · AnimalsHAPPY HEART-HAPPY HOME FARM AND RESCUE — $72,060 · AnimalsVEGAN FRIENDLY INC — $15,000 · AnimalsRANCHO RELAXO INC — $10,000 · Animals+6 more — $17,800 · AnimalsCEASEFIRE PENNSYLVANIA — $22,500 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR JEWISH FOOD ETHICS — $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
International$3,568,406Other$1,417,650Philanthropy$427,000Education$419,000Animals$194,860Civil Rights$22,500Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $3,568,406 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetJACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMY — $436,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $387,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUHLENBERG COLLEGE — $324,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKaruna Foundation — $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHAPPY HEART-HAPPY HOME FARM AND RESCUE — $72,060 over 5y, 17% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $53,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE LIKE BLAINE FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetCEASEFIRE PENNSYLVANIA — $22,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR JEWISH FOOD ETHICS — $20,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF RITTENHOUSE SQUARE — $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE COUNCIL FOR CANADIAN AMERICAN RELATIONS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMESIVTA HIGH SCHOOL OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $13,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MARION AND AARON GURAL JCC INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJoshua M Katz Memorial Fund — $11,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetRANCHO RELAXO INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBRYN MAWR THEATRE FILM INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Liberty Museum — $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE FOOD BUSINESS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLY BULLY TEAM — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDELAWARE COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $1,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPark City Performances — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOUIS D BRANDEIS LAW SOCIETY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetGolden Slipper Camp — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOCHRANVILLE FIRE COMPANY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRX BALLROOM DANCE — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRadnor Studio 21 Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF BET ELAZRAKI - EMTC INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLARCHMONT SCHOOLS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds JACK M BARRACK HEBREW ACADEMY
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM
  • Who funds MUHLENBERG COLLEGE
  • Who funds Karuna Foundation
  • Who funds HAPPY HEART-HAPPY HOME FARM AND RESCUE
  • Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC
  • Who funds LIVE LIKE BLAINE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CEASEFIRE PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CENTER FOR JEWISH FOOD ETHICS
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF RITTENHOUSE SQUARE
  • Who funds THE COUNCIL FOR CANADIAN AMERICAN RELATIONS INC
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds VEGAN FRIENDLY INC
  • Who funds MESIVTA HIGH SCHOOL OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds THE MARION AND AARON GURAL JCC INC
  • Who funds Joshua M Katz Memorial Fund
  • Who funds RANCHO RELAXO INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Saramar Charitable FundPA23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Saramar Charitable Fund · Max and Bella Stein Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · Erlbaum Family Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Philadelphia Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Max and Bella Stein Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Max and Bella Stein Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Max and Bella Stein Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph