Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Matthew Marks Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$244k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$897kCivil Rights$217kEducation$205kEnvironment$158kHealth$144kCrime & Legal$69kYouth Development$29kHuman Services$24kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$3,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$95,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$15,000
SCENIC HUDSON INC$10,000
HUDSON HIGHLANDS LAND TRUST$10,000
THE NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE$10,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$10,000
OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE$10,000
BENNINGTON COLLEGE$10,000
FOUNDATION FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS$10,000
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION$10,000
LAXART$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MANITOGA INC$5,000
ARTISTS SPACE$5,000
ACLU$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE: $10k → 17%HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE: $5k → 17%HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%HETRICK MARTIN INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 45 repeat orgs$359k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
26

Total granted

$1.4M
$349k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+13%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationCrime & LegalCivil RightsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    Museum of Modern Art
    5× · 2020–2024 · $297k · revenue +38%
  • TS
    THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM
    4× · 2020–2023 · $100k · revenue +305%
  • HH
    Hudson Highlands Land Trust Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $86k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • PM
    PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +8%
  • WM
    WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +183%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
2
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
3
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
4
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
5
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
6
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
7
Amigos Del Museo Del Barrio Inc El Museo Del Barrio

El museo's mission is to preserve, interpret, and promote the artistic heritage of puerto ricans and all latin americans in the united states by means of exhibitions, public programs, publications, and educational activities.

Arts & Culture
8
Mint Museum of Art Inc

The mint museum welcomes all to be inspired and transformed through the power of art and creativity.

Arts & Culture
9
Apex Art Curatorial Program Inc

Apex Art Curatorial Program is a resolutely noncommercial visual art exhibition space which provides curators and artists with a venue dedicated to ideas that are often too provocative or too small in scope for display elsewhere. Apex Art…

Arts & Culture
10
Municipal Art Society of New York

The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…

Arts & Culture
11
Artpace Inc (Audit)

Artpace san antonio is a nonprofit residency program which supports texas, national, and international artists in the creation of new art. see schedule o for continuation.

Arts & Culture
12
The National Museum of Women in the Arts

The mission of the national museum of women in the arts is to collect, conserve and elevate the achievements of women artists from all nationalities and to educate the public on their outstanding accomplishments. we strive to accomplish…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Artists Space Inc; the most unlike its peers is Putnam County Sheriffs Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
37/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Museum of Modern Art: $296,500 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern ArtPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $100,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ARTTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEMWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $100,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ARTFOUNDATION FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS INC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureFOUNDATION FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS INCARTISTS SPACE INC: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+11 more: $88,500 · Arts & Culture+11 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD: $97,200 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODTHE NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE: $70,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCEIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGLAAD INC: $31,000 · OtherGLAAD INCACLU: $30,000 · OtherACLUMENIL SOCIETY: $30,000 · OtherMENIL SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $23,500 · OtherLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $22,200 · Other+32 more: $173,645 · Other+32 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $80,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES…BENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION: $60,000 · EducationBENNINGTON C…BARD COLLEGE: $30,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGEPOINT FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationPOINT FOUNDA…SKIDMORE COLLEGE: $15,000 · EducationSKIDMORE COL…Hudson Highlands Land Trust Inc: $86,000 · EnvironmentHudson High…Scenic Hudson Inc: $50,000 · EnvironmentScenic Huds…MANITOGA INC: $40,000 · EnvironmentMANITOGA IN…OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 · Environment+1 more: $5,000 · EnvironmentHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $10,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $2,000 · Civil RightsTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $29,000 · Human ServicesVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC: $16,000 · Crime & LegalJUSTLEADERSHIPUSA INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Arts & Culture$785,000Other$527,545Education$205,000Environment$191,000Civil Rights$82,000Human Services$29,000Crime & Legal$23,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $296,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM: $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHudson Highlands Land Trust Inc: $86,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMANITOGA INC: $40,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetGLAAD INC: $31,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetARTISTS SPACE INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC: $29,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $22,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRICK: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC: $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNetwork on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SENTENCING PROJECT: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART MIAMI INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE COLUMNS INC: $10,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetOPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN ART MUSEUM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH JUSTICE COALITION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGARRISON'S LANDING ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTLEADERSHIPUSA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPutnam County Sheriffs Department: $5,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetOCTOBER MAGAZINE: $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOETRY SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $3,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILIPSTOWN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HUB INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetN1 FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM ↗
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds Hudson Highlands Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BENNINGTON COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Scenic Hudson Inc ↗
  • Who funds MANITOGA INC ↗
  • Who funds GLAAD INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS SPACE INC ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE HETRICK-MARTIN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE BRICK ↗
  • Who funds POINT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Network on Women in Prison dba Legal Services for Prisoners w Children ↗
  • Who funds THE SENTENCING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITE COLUMNS INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH JUSTICE COALITION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts IncNY17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · The Ford Foundation · Lostand Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Helen Frankenthaler Foundation Inc · The Cowles Charitable Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Matthew Marks Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Matthew Marks Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Bennington College Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Matthew Marks Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Matthew Marks Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Matthew Marks’ filings →

More from the funding graph