Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Matthew Frank Moore Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$84kHuman Services$78kHealth$57kPhilanthropy$42kReligion$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$27kCrime & Legal$23kEducation$19kOther$0
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k9 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU$12,420
GRANGER COMMUNITY CHURCH$12,000
IWIN$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS$7,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$7,500
UNITED HEALTH SERVICES$5,000
DUNEBROOK$5,000
CORVILLA$5,000
UNITED HEALTH SERVICES$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–26, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 14%BAGS OF LOVE: $2k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%STEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN: $5k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%STEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN: $5k → 15%CHRISTMAS COMMANDO'S: $8k → 13%STEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN: $5k → 15%CHRISTMAS COMMANDO'S: $5k → 13%STEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN: $5k → 15%CHRISTMAS COMMANDO'S: $5k → 13%CHRISTMAS COMMANDO'S: $3k → 13%CHRISTMAS COMMANDO'S: $3k → 13%CHRISTMAS COMMANDO'S: $3k → 13%CORVILLA: $5k → 13%CORVILLA: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$405k · 20 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
20

Total granted

$405k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+10%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    6× · 2019–2026 · $39k · revenue +63%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    7× · 2019–2026 · $32k · revenue +39%
  • DI
    DUNEBROOK INC
    5× · 2019–2026 · $25k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • HF
    HEROES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • FE
    FISCHOFF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM
    one grant, 2025 · $8k
  • HH
    HANNAH'S HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hoosier Families Inc

Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…

Human Services
2
Habitat for Humanity International Wabash County Hfh

Wabash county habitat for humanity, inc. is a non-profit organization working in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to build decent, affordable housing.

—
3
Homebound Meals Inc

The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.

—
4
Lifetime Housing Group Inc

Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.

Food & Nutrition
5
Stepping Stones Inc

To provide safety, support, and protection to the victims of domestic violence and/or sexual assault and to deepen the understanding of domestic violence through education and prevention techniques. includes a shelter, counseling, and a…

—
6
Bounce Back of Indiana Inc

To provide relief and hope to people facing an unexpected financial crisis.

Food & Nutrition
7
Greater Lafayette Family Shelter Inc

To provide temporary housing and other support services to homeless families in the greater Lafayette area of Tippecanoe County, Indiana

Food & Nutrition
8
Habitat for Humanity Clark & Floyd Indiana Inc

The construction and renovation of homes for low income families.

—
9
Indiana Guardianship Services

At indiana guardianship services, inc., we are dedicated to providing our clients with the same compassion, attention, and patience as our own family. through competence, service, and dignity, we uphold the values of the national…

Human Services
10
Second Heart Homes Inc

The mission of second heart homes is to revive the dignity of homeless adults with mental illnesses through housing, support, and love.

Housing & Shelter
11
Caring House Inc

To promote a violence free atmosphere from domestic and sexual violence in which survivors can recognize their options to have the opportunity to continue living violence free and regain their sense of self-worth; to educate and raise…

Human Services
12
Life Restoration Services Inc

The Lighthouse exists to serve men who struggle with life-altering addiction by providing structure, education, support and mentorship. We also strive to be a bridge in the healing process between these men and their families.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pack Away Hunger Inc; the most unlike its peers is South Bend Firefighters Associationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRANGER COMMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $49,880 · OtherGRANGER COMMMUNITY CHURCH INCIWIN: $43,700 · OtherIWINUNITED HEALTH SERVICES: $43,000 · OtherUNITED HEALTH SERVICESUNITED WAY OF LP COUNTY: $42,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF LP COUNTYTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $38,500 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INCYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $25,420 · OtherYOUTH SERVICE BUREAUDUNEBROOK INC: $25,000 · OtherDUNEBROOK INCLAPORTE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $14,000 · OtherYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU - ST JOE CO: $13,500 · Other+19 more: $56,124 · Other+19 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $32,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red …CHRISTMAS COMMANDOS: $26,500 · Human ServicesCHRISTMAS COMMANDOSSTEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSTEPPING STONE SHELTER…CORVILLA INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesCORVILLA INCHANNAH'S HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $4,252 · Human ServicesHEROES FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthCONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC: $530 · HealthPACK AWAY HUNGER INC: $6,000 · Youth Development100 BLACK MEN OF GREATER SOUTH BEND: $3,000 · Civil RightsSOUTH BEND FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATIONINC: $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterFRIENDS OF GRANGER PATHS INC: $1,000 · EducationARTS IN THE PARK LTD: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$351,124Human Services$95,752Health$15,530Youth Development$6,000Civil Rights$3,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,000Education$1,000Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $38,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $32,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTMAS COMMANDOS: $26,500 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetDUNEBROOK INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSTEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN INC: $20,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetHEROES FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLAPORTE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $14,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetPACK AWAY HUNGER INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHANNAH'S HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget100 BLACK MEN OF GREATER SOUTH BEND: $3,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSpringHill Camps: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRIME STOPPERS INC: $2,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetBAGS OF LOVE: $2,252 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREAL SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREINS OF LIFE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARTS IN THE PARK LTD: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTMAS COMMANDOS ↗
  • Who funds DUNEBROOK INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HEROES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAPORTE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds CORVILLA INC ↗
  • Who funds PACK AWAY HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds HANNAH'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF GREATER SOUTH BEND ↗
  • Who funds SpringHill Camps ↗
  • Who funds CRIME STOPPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BAGS OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BEND FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds REAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds REINS OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF GRANGER PATHS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-XxxxIN19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · Unity Foundation of la Porte County · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · Radiology Inc Foundation · Healthcare Foundation of la Porte Inc · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Michigan City Community Enrichment Corporation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Matthew Frank Moore Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Matthew Frank Moore Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Matthew Frank Moore’s filings →

    More from the funding graph