· Private foundation
The Matthew Frank Moore Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of THE MATTHEW FRANK MOORE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU | $13,000 |
| GRANGER COMMUNITY CHURCH | $12,000 |
| CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS | $12,000 |
| FISCHOFF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM | $8,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $7,500 |
| CHRISTMAS COMMANDO'S | $7,500 |
| UNITED HEALTH SERVICES | $3,000 |
| UNITED HEALTH SERVICES | $3,000 |
| UNITED HEALTH SERVICES | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,137 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION | $530 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC5× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +63%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches6× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +39%
- DIDUNEBROOK INC4× · 2019–2023 · $20k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- HFHEROES FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
- HHHANNAH'S HOUSE INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +53%
- CICORVILLA INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +83%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.
Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…
Wabash county habitat for humanity, inc. is a non-profit organization working in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to build decent, affordable housing.
Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.
To provide safety, support, and protection to the victims of domestic violence and/or sexual assault and to deepen the understanding of domestic violence through education and prevention techniques. includes a shelter, counseling, and a…
To provide relief and hope to people facing an unexpected financial crisis.
To provide temporary housing and other support services to homeless families in the greater Lafayette area of Tippecanoe County, Indiana
The construction and renovation of homes for low income families.
Provide shelter and assistance to victims of domestic violence in lake county and the flathead indian reservation.
At indiana guardianship services, inc., we are dedicated to providing our clients with the same compassion, attention, and patience as our own family. through competence, service, and dignity, we uphold the values of the national…
The mission of second heart homes is to revive the dignity of homeless adults with mental illnesses through housing, support, and love.
To promote a violence free atmosphere from domestic and sexual violence in which survivors can recognize their options to have the opportunity to continue living violence free and regain their sense of self-worth; to educate and raise…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pack Away Hunger Inc and the most unlike its peers is South Bend Firefighters Associationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTMAS COMMANDOS ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds DUNEBROOK INC ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds HEROES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAPORTE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds PACK AWAY HUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds HANNAH'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CORVILLA INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF GREATER SOUTH BEND ↗
- Who funds SpringHill Camps ↗
- Who funds CRIME STOPPERS INC ↗
- Who funds BAGS OF LOVE ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BEND FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
- Who funds REAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds REINS OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF GRANGER PATHS INC ↗
- Who funds CONCUSSION LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN THE PARK LTD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Judd Leighton Foundation Inc · Unity Foundation of la Porte County · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Community Foundation of Elkhart County Inc · Radiology Inc Foundation · Healthcare Foundation of la Porte Inc · Carroll F V Char Tr-Main · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Michigan City Community Enrichment Corporation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Matthew Frank Moore Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.