· Private foundation
The Mark E Pollack Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VILLAGE SCHOOL INC | $70,000 |
| PUBLIC COUNSEL | $25,000 |
| GIVING BACK FUND INC | $20,000 |
| THE WINDWARD SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| INDEPENDENT SCHOOL ALLIANCE FOR MINORITY AFFAIRS | $10,000 |
| FRACTURED ATLAS INC | $10,000 |
| CHANGE THE REF INC | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY INC | $5,000 |
| CONGREGATION OR AMI | $5,000 |
| BALLET HISPANICO OF NEW YORK | $5,000 |
| JACOB JONAS THE COMPANY INC | $5,000 |
| SHAREWELL | $5,000 |
| LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES | $3,000 |
| YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN L | $1,000 |
| INSIDEOUT WRITERS INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VSVILLAGE SCHOOL INC8× · 2018–2025 · $343k · revenue +178%
Vanderbilt University5× · 2017–2023 · $140k · revenue +74%- ISINDEPENDENT SCHOOL ALLIANCE FOR MINORITY AFFAIRS3× · 2018–2025 · $53k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- SLSALT LAKE CITY FILM CENTER AND ARTISTS COLLABORATIone grant, 2023 · $20k
- LALOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMYgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +148%
- MPMARFA PUBLIC RADIO CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +72%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.
Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…
The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.
To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…
To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…
Meeting the professional needs of los angeles lawyers, and improving the administration of justice.
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dolores C Huerta Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Marlene F Landy Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VILLAGE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT SCHOOL ALLIANCE FOR MINORITY AFFAIRS ↗
- Who funds MARLENE F LANDY CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KCRW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SHAREWELL ↗
- Who funds BALLET HISPANICO OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC COUNSEL ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE PALISADES PRESCHOOL ↗
- Who funds YOUTH REPRESENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING BACK FUND ↗
- Who funds THE WINDWARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY ↗
- Who funds Friends of Third Street School ↗
- Who funds MARFA PUBLIC RADIO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEN AMERICA LOS ANGELES FKA PEN CENTER USA WEST ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PERFORMANCE PRACTICE ↗
- Who funds CHANGE THE REF INC ↗
- Who funds Palm Springs Center for Creativity ↗
- Who funds Go Campaign ↗
- Who funds Teach Democracy ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CONTEMPORARY BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds HEAL THE BAY ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF KONA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH HAWAII HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds PALI COMMUNITY CENTER COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds HOPE-NET ↗
- Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDRENS ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds The Council on Recovery ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Lear Family Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · The California Endowment · The J Paul Getty Trust · The James Irvine Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Mark E Pollack Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
- Center for Childrens Advocacy Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.