Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mark and Janice Gold Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$78k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$85kHuman Services$16kEducation$10kEnvironment$4kArts & Culture$3kYouth Development$3kHousing & Shelter$2kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $78k
$250
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASH U INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH$78,000
SAILFISH POINT FOUNDATION$2,000
WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCILS OF AMERICA$1,700
VINEYARDS CLIFFS RESIDENTS OUTREACH$1,000
FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY$500
LYRIC THEATRE$500
FAR HILLS BEDMINSTER FIRST AID$250
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$250
TYLER UGOLYN FOUNDATION$250
FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES$250
ST JOHNS RIVER KEEPER$250
YALE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH$250
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$250
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$250
CROHNS COLITIS FOUNDATION$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $350) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SAFE SPACE: $200 → 10%SAFE SPACE: $150 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
CT
RI
MO
TN
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$429k · 14 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$429k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+50%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEnvironmentScience & TechYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAILFISH POINT FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $14k · revenue +22%
  • FO
    FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +23%
  • PL
    PROJECT LIFT INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY - AGAGANEAN HENIGER
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY - KELLY D BROWNELL
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • ST
    SHOULDER TO SHOULDER
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Captains for Clean Water Inc

To advance education, awareness, and scientifically supported solutions to restore and protect marine ecosystems and our way of life for future generations.

Environment
3
The Everglades Foundation Inc

The mission of the foundation is to restore and protect america's everglades through its three programmatic pillars: science, advocacy and education. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Institute for Shipboard Education

Journeys of discovery that spark bold solutions to global challenges.

Education
5
Saint Andrew's School of Boca Raton Inc

Saint andrew's school is an independent school founded in the episcopal tradition. our mission is to build a community of learners, provide excellence in education, and nurture each student in mind, body, and spirit.

Education
6
Sea Research Foundation Inc

To inspire people to care for and protect our ocean planet through education and research.

Animals
7
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
8
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
9
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
10
Florida Policy Institute Inc

Fpi's mission is to advance state policies and budgets that improve the economic mobility and quality of life for all floridians. our vision is that of a state where every floridian has an equal opportunity to thrive (continued on schedule…

Public Benefit
11
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation Inc

To advance florida gulf coast university and its students by promoting the institution, securing philanthropy to support the needs of the university, managing and administering assets with a long term perspective, and providing resources…

Education
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safespace Inc; the most unlike its peers is Keowee Vineyards Fire Dist Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $317,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWASH U INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: $83,000 · OtherWASH U INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH+15 more: $18,500 · OtherSAILFISH POINT FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · EducationTHE BOLLES SCHOOL: $500 · Education+1 more: $450 · EducationFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $3,000 · Science & TechPROJECT LIFT INC: $2,750 · Youth DevelopmentWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCILS OF AMERICA: $1,700 · InternationalCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $750 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES INC: $750 · EnvironmentST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC: $250 · Environment
Other$419,000Education$14,950Science & Tech$3,000Youth Development$2,750International$1,700Health$1,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAILFISH POINT FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT LIFT INC: $2,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCILS OF AMERICA: $1,700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES INC: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOLLES SCHOOL: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFESPACE INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEOWEE VINEYARDS FIRE DIST FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAILFISH POINT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT LIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCILS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOLLES SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAFESPACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds KEOWEE VINEYARDS FIRE DIST FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mark and Janice Gold Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mark and Janice Gold Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Safespace Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Florida Oceanographic Society Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Mark and Janice Gold Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Mark and Janice Gold Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mark and Janice Gold Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph