Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Marilyn J Fulton Foundation Char Tr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of THE MARILYN J FULTON FOUNDATION CHAR TR’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$479k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILESTONE INC$5,200
SALVATION ARMY$5,200
RAMP$5,200
NATURAL LAND INSTITUTE$5,200
BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE$5,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MILESTONE INC: $6k → 15%MILESTONE INC: $6k → 15%MILESTONE INC: $5k → 15%MILESTONE INC: $5k → 15%MILESTONE INC: $5k → 15%MILESTONE INC: $5k → 15%MILESTONE INC: $5k → 15%MILESTONE INC: $5k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $6k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $6k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $6k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $5k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $5k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $5k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $5k → 15%BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 5 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY — $44,765 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYREGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC — $42,766 · OtherREGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INCBARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE — $42,766 · Human ServicesBARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPEMILESTONE INC — $41,766 · Human ServicesMILESTONE INCNATURAL LAND INSTITUTE — $43,982 · EnvironmentNATURAL LAND INSTITUTE
Other$87,531Human Services$84,532Environment$43,982

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATURAL LAND INSTITUTE — $43,982 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE — $42,766 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetREGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC — $42,766 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMILESTONE INC — $41,766 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATURAL LAND INSTITUTE
  • Who funds BARBARA OLSON CENTER OF HOPE
  • Who funds REGIONAL ACCESS & MOBILIZATION PROJECT INC
  • Who funds MILESTONE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Guy Reno Family FoundationWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Guy Reno Family Foundation · The Ben Harding Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern IL · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Marilyn J Fulton Foundation Char Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Marilyn J Fulton Foundation Char Tr?

    Find your warmest path to The Marilyn J Fulton Foundation Char Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph