Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Maribill Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$141kAnimals$24kArts & Culture$18kHealth$13kHuman Services$9kInternational$8kYouth Development$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k31 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$632k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY INNOCENTS' EPISCOPAL CHURCH$12,000
FRIENDS OF SHADY LANE CEMETERY$2,000
WALLY GORDON COMMUNITY SINGERS$2,000
ST MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,000
SOCIETY OF AFRICAN MISSIONS$1,000
MERIWETHER HISTORICAL SOCIETY$600
CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED$500
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$500
300 CLUB OF ATLANTA$500
ALLIANCE FOR CHRISTIAN MEDIA$500
EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT$500
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$500
FORWARD MOVEMENT$500
CARPATHIA PAWS$500
HISTORIC BEAUFORT FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JUST PEOPLE INC: $100 → 9%JUST PEOPLE INC: $100 → 9%JUST PEOPLE INC: $100 → 9%ATLANTA UNION MISSION: $500 → 13%ATLANTA UNION MISSION: $300 → 13%ATLANTA UNION MISSION: $200 → 13%ATLANTA UNION MISSION: $200 → 13%ATLANTA UNION MISSION: $200 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IA
OH
PA
NJ
VA
MD
NC
SC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$246k · 45 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
15

Total granted

$246k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+51%

Still filing today

40%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PAPAYAGO RESCUE HOUSE INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $20k · revenue +8%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +48%
  • TS
    THE SANDY SPRINGS SOCIETY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • CS
    CITY SPRINGS THEATER
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • KP
    KEMPSVILLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • DUKE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +51%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Acfb Support Organization Inc

Acfb support organization, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.

Food & Nutrition
2
American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia Inc

The aclu of georgia is dedicated to preserving the civil liberties enshrined in the u.s. constitution and bill of rights. through litigation, lobbying, and communications, the aclu of georgia works to preserve and enhance the rights of all…

3
Atlanta Neighborhood Development Partnership Inc

To develop, finance, and advocate for affordable housing at scale that promotes racial equity and healthy communities where families thrive.

Housing & Shelter
4
Corporate Volunteer Council of Atlanta

Cvc of atlanta encourages corporate members to develop excellence in corporate volunteerism. develop programs and provide resources.

Community Improvement
5
Aclu Foundation of Georgia Inc

The aclu of georgia is dedicated to preserving the civil liberties enshrined in the u.s. constitution and bill of rights. through litigation, lobbying, and communications, the aclu of georgia works to preserve and enhance the rights of all…

Civil Rights
6
Annandale At Suwanee Inc

To perpetuate a village community to provide progressive life assistance to adults with developmental disabilities so that they can maximize their abilities and maintain their independence in the least restrictive environment.

Health
7
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
8
Acfb Charitable Investments Inc

Acfb charitable investments, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.

Food & Nutrition
9
Credit Union of Georgia

The credit union is a cooperative organized to provide members thrift savings and borrowings.

10
Status Home Inc F/K/a Jerusalem House Inc

The organization provides afforable, supportive housing for metro atlanta's most vulnerable, particularly those living with or impacted by hiv.

Housing & Shelter
11
United Way of Greater Chattanooga

Uniting people and resources in building a stronger, healthier community

Philanthropy
12
Georgia United Credit Union

Ga united credit union was organized in 1958 to serve our members' financial needs. as a credit union, we operate as a not-for-profit financial cooperative that encourages thrift by providing loans at fair and reasonable rates, paying…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is The Sandy Springs Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Shelter and RescueVeterans Support Organizati…Affordable Housing ProvidersArts & Cultural Organizatio…Evangelical Churches and Mi…Hospital Support & Cancer S…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%4%<5yr17%4%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr14%20%20–35yr9%36%35–55yr13%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%1%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr14%4%20–35yr9%78%35–55yr13%2%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
19%
10,947/58,272

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
19/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOLY INNOCENTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $111,600 · OtherHOLY INNOCENTS EPISCOPAL CHURCHST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $11,230 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,500 · OtherSOCIETY OF AFRICAN MISSIONS — $8,000 · Other+45 more — $79,350 · Other+45 morePAPAYAGO RESCUE HOUSE INC — $20,000 · AnimalsPAPAYAGO R…CARPATHIA PAWS INC — $2,000 · AnimalsCARPATHIA …INDRALOKA ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $1,500 · AnimalsINDRALOKA …EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $2,800 · Human ServicesATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $2,400 · Human ServicesJUST PEOPLE INC — $300 · Human ServicesHISTORIC BEAUFORT FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Arts & CultureCHORAL SOCIETY OF WEST GEORGIA INC — $1,600 · Arts & CultureDUKE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · EducationDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION — $1,136 · EducationTHE 300 CLUB OF ATLANTA INC — $2,700 · Community ImprovementJunior League of Atlanta Inc — $300 · Community ImprovementGEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $2,800 · Health
Other$220,680Animals$23,500Human Services$5,500Arts & Culture$4,600Education$3,136Community Improvement$3,000Health$2,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPAPAYAGO RESCUE HOUSE INC — $20,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetCENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC — $4,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC — $3,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SANDY SPRINGS SOCIETY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHISTORIC BEAUFORT FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $2,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $2,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 300 CLUB OF ATLANTA INC — $2,700 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetEmpty Stocking Fund Inc — $2,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $2,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $2,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARPATHIA PAWS INC — $2,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCHORAL SOCIETY OF WEST GEORGIA INC — $1,600 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINDRALOKA ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHRISTIAN MEDIA INC — $1,400 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION — $1,136 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUST PEOPLE INC — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PAPAYAGO RESCUE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE SANDY SPRINGS SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds HISTORIC BEAUFORT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds THE 300 CLUB OF ATLANTA INC
  • Who funds Empty Stocking Fund Inc
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CARPATHIA PAWS INC
  • Who funds CHORAL SOCIETY OF WEST GEORGIA INC
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds INDRALOKA ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHRISTIAN MEDIA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Maribill Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph