Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Marian B and Jacob K Javits Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$310k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.8MPhilanthropy$491kPublic Benefit$195kHealth$172kScience & Tech$145kHousing & Shelter$25kCommunity Improvement$15kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$61k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS$150,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY$50,000
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC$30,000
PROJECT RENEWAL INC$25,000
ROBERT PACKARD CTR FOR ALS RESEARCH$15,000
ALS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK CHAPTER$15,000
UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION$15,000
CITYMEALS ON WHEELS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%DUKE UNIVERSITY CASE: $15k → 9%UC REGENTS: $60k → 10%DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $30k → 10%STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 7%PROJECT RENEWAL INC: $25k → 17%BEDFORD STUYVESANT RESTORATION CORPORATION: $15k → 20%RESULTS FOR AMERICA: $80k → 14%MEDICAL FOUNDATION OF NC: $10k → 13%THE ROBERT PACKARD CENTER: $20k → 11%ROBERT PACKARD CTR FOR ALS RESEARCH: $15k → 19%JOHNS HOPKINS ROBERT PACKARD: $10k → 9%UNIV OF CA REGENTS: $50k → 10%STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY: $50k → 7%THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $150k → 17%RESULTS FOR AMERICA: $25k → 14%MEDICAL FOUNDATION OF NC: $10k → 13%THE ROBERT PACKARD CENTER: $10k → 11%JHU NEUROLOGY: $25k → 19%THE MED FDN OF NC: $10k → 9%UNIV OF CA REGENTS: $50k → 10%STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY: $50k → 7%THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $40k → 17%OPPORTUNITY NATION: $10k → 14%MEDICAL FOUNDATION OF NC: $10k → 13%JHU NEUROLOGY: $10k → 19%RPA FOR UPSTART CO LAB ROCKEFE: $10k → 9%UNIV OF CA REGENTS: $50k → 10%THE STONY BROOK FOUNDATION: $40k → 7%THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $20k → 17%SMITHSONIAN INSTITIUTION: $10k → 14%UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15k → 13%SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $10k → 9%UC REGENTS: $50k → 10%STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY: $40k → 7%THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $20k → 17%COLLEGE TO CONGRESS: $10k → 14%THE MED FDN OF NC: $10k → 9%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $40k → 10%THE STONY BROOK FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $20k → 17%COLLEGE TO CONGRESS: $10k → 14%PROJECT RENEWAL: $10k → 9%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY: $50k → 10%THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $20k → 17%MILLENIAL ACTION PROJECT: $10k → 14%THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $11k → 17%ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS: $450k → 17%ALS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK CHAPTER: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 16 repeat orgs$289k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +145% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
14

Total granted

$2.2M
$189k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+145%
0%

Still filing today

31%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentHousing & ShelterHealthFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $291k · revenue +292%
  • RF
    RESULTS FOR AMERICA
    2× · 2017–2019 · $105k · revenue +78%
  • SB
    STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $73k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIV OF CALIFORNIA-BERKLEY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • BS
    Bedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
11
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc; the most unlike its peers is Millennial Action Project Dba Future Caucus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY: $1,140,000 · OtherSTONY BROOK UNIVERSITYTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $290,700 · OtherTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INCUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA REGENTS: $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA REGENTSUC REGENTS: $110,000 · Other+23 more: $469,333 · Other+23 moreROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $455,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILAN…DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHAR…RESULTS FOR AMERICA: $105,000 · EducationRESULTS F…STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $73,298 · EducationSTONY BRO…UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $47,000 · EducationUNC HEALT…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationJOHNS HOP…PROJECT RENEWAL INC: $25,000 · HealthBedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $10,000 · Food & NutritionMILLENNIAL ACTION PROJECT DBA FUTURE CAUCUS: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$2,160,033Philanthropy$485,000Education$240,298Health$25,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $455,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $290,700 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetRESULTS FOR AMERICA: $105,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $73,298 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $47,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCollege to Congress: $30,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetPROJECT RENEWAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS: $10,580 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILLENNIAL ACTION PROJECT DBA FUTURE CAUCUS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $5,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDUSTRIAL COMMONS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds RESULTS FOR AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds College to Congress ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT RENEWAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Bedford Stuyvesant Restoration Corporation ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CORNING MUSEUM OF GLASS ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds MILLENNIAL ACTION PROJECT DBA FUTURE CAUCUS ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds THE INDUSTRIAL COMMONS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Marian B and Jacob K Javits Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Marian B and Jacob K Javits Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Marian B and Jacob K Javits Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Marian B and Jacob K Javits Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marian B and Jacob K Javits’ filings →

More from the funding graph