Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Marcia & Kent Velde Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$205k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$670kArts & Culture$169kReligion$69kHuman Services$54kPhilanthropy$14kHousing & Shelter$3kHealth$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $145k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY$90,000
NOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE$55,000
MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER$10,000
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM$6,500
ST MARCUS LUTHERAN SCHOOL$5,000
FORMATION FOUNDATION$5,000
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$5,000
DIVINE SAVIOR HOLY ANGEL HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
ACTS HOUSING$2,500
BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER$2,500
ST ROBERT SCHOOL$2,500
WOMEN'S CARE CENTER$2,500
NATIVITY JESUIT ACADEMY$2,500
ST ROBERT CHURCH$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER: $10k → 5%MARY'S CHOICE RVA: $1k → 22%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER: $5k → 5%MARY'S CHOICE RVA: $1k → 22%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER: $3k → 5%MARY'S CHOICE RVA: $1k → 22%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER: $3k → 5%MARY'S CHOICE RVA: $1k → 22%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER: $3k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$956k · 21 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
4

Total granted

$956k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-16%

Still filing today

33%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $200k · revenue +301%
  • MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +92%
  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $44k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • DB
    DAVID B WEBBER FSB SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • LP
    LAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -16%
  • SA
    SCHLITZ AUDUBON CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
2
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
3
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
4
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

—
5
Wisconsin Museum of Nature and Culture

WMNC will continue constructing the new Milwaukee Public Museum facility to completion and will then continue as the owner and operator of the new museum.

Arts & Culture
6
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

—
7
Milwaukee Parks Foundation Inc

Engage our community in supporting milwaukee county parks to collectively steward a thriving park system.

Environment
8
Milwaukee Ballet Company Inc

Milwaukee ballet transforms lives and connects communities through inspiring performance, community engagement, education and training.

Arts & Culture
9
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
10
Milwaukee Catholic Home Inc

Rooted in our catholic tradition and commitment to christian love and community, milwaukee catholic home, inc. (mch) provides continuing care services for older adults.

Human Services
11
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce

Improve metro milwaukee as a place to create jobs, invest capital and grow business.

—
12
Downtown Montessori Academy Inc

To create a montessori environment where the child's early experiences with learning will help him or her to become a self-confident, competent, cooperative adult.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marys Choice Rva. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE INC: $262,500 · OtherNOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE INCST MARCUS LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $70,000 · OtherST MARCUS LUTHERAN SCHOOLST ROBERT SCHOOL: $35,600 · OtherST ROBERT SCHOOLCATHEDRAL OF THE SACRED HEART: $30,500 · OtherCATHEDRAL OF THE SACRED HEARTFORMATION FOUNDATION: $27,500 · OtherDIVINE SAVIOR HOLY ANGEL HIGH SCHOOL: $27,500 · OtherMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $26,000 · OtherWOMEN'S CARE CENTER: $24,000 · Other+10 more: $43,250 · Other+10 moreST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $200,000 · EducationST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY …THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $21,500 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WI…MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $110,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE REPERTORY…MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $44,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEU…MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MU…BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesMARYS CHOICE RVA: $4,000 · Human ServicesARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $13,500 · PhilanthropyLAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD: $1,000 · PhilanthropyACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $2,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$546,850Education$221,500Arts & Culture$169,000Human Services$26,500Philanthropy$14,500Housing & Shelter$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $200,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $110,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $44,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC: $22,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $21,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $13,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMARYS CHOICE RVA: $4,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYS CHOICE RVA ↗
  • Who funds ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Barbara and John Trimble Family Foundation Inc · Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Marcia & Kent Velde Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Marcia & Kent Velde Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Marcia & Kent Velde Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Marcia & Kent Velde Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marcia & Kent Velde’s filings →

    More from the funding graph