Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Marcia & Kent Velde Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$205k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$670kArts & Culture$169kReligion$69kHuman Services$54kPhilanthropy$14kHousing & Shelter$3kHealth$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $145k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY$90,000
NOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE$55,000
MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER$10,000
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM$6,500
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
ST MARCUS LUTHERAN SCHOOL$5,000
FORMATION FOUNDATION$5,000
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$5,000
DIVINE SAVIOR HOLY ANGEL HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
ACTS HOUSING$2,500
WOMEN'S CARE CENTER$2,500
NATIVITY JESUIT ACADEMY$2,500
ST ROBERT SCHOOL$2,500
BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER$2,500
ST ROBERT CHURCH$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER: $10k → 5%MARY'S CHOICE RVA: $1k → 22%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER: $5k → 5%MARY'S CHOICE RVA: $1k → 22%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER: $3k → 5%MARY'S CHOICE RVA: $1k → 22%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER: $3k → 5%MARY'S CHOICE RVA: $1k → 22%BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER: $3k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$956k · 21 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
4

Total granted

$956k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-16%

Still filing today

33%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $200k · revenue +301%
  • MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +92%
  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $44k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • DB
    DAVID B WEBBER FSB SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • SA
    SCHLITZ AUDUBON CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • LP
    LAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

2
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
3
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
4
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

5
Wisconsin Museum of Nature and Culture

WMNC will continue constructing the new Milwaukee Public Museum facility to completion and will then continue as the owner and operator of the new museum.

Arts & Culture
6
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

7
Milwaukee Parks Foundation Inc

Engage our community in supporting milwaukee county parks to collectively steward a thriving park system.

Environment
8
Milwaukee Ballet Company Inc

Milwaukee ballet transforms lives and connects communities through inspiring performance, community engagement, education and training.

Arts & Culture
9
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
10
Milwaukee Catholic Home Inc

Rooted in our catholic tradition and commitment to christian love and community, milwaukee catholic home, inc. (mch) provides continuing care services for older adults.

Human Services
11
Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce

Improve metro milwaukee as a place to create jobs, invest capital and grow business.

12
Downtown Montessori Academy Inc

To create a montessori environment where the child's early experiences with learning will help him or her to become a self-confident, competent, cooperative adult.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marys Choice Rva. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE INC — $262,500 · OtherNOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE INCST MARCUS LUTHERAN SCHOOL — $70,000 · OtherST MARCUS LUTHERAN SCHOOLST ROBERT SCHOOL — $35,600 · OtherST ROBERT SCHOOLCATHEDRAL OF THE SACRED HEART — $30,500 · OtherCATHEDRAL OF THE SACRED HEARTFORMATION FOUNDATION — $27,500 · OtherDIVINE SAVIOR HOLY ANGEL HIGH SCHOOL — $27,500 · OtherMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL — $26,000 · OtherWOMEN'S CARE CENTER — $24,000 · Other+10 more — $43,250 · Other+10 moreST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC — $200,000 · EducationST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY …THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $21,500 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WI…MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC — $110,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE REPERTORY…MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $44,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEU…MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MU…BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC — $22,500 · Human ServicesMARYS CHOICE RVA — $4,000 · Human ServicesARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $13,500 · PhilanthropyLAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD — $1,000 · PhilanthropyACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $2,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$546,850Education$221,500Arts & Culture$169,000Human Services$26,500Philanthropy$14,500Housing & Shelter$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC — $200,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC — $110,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $44,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC — $22,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $21,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $13,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMARYS CHOICE RVA — $4,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds BRIDGE TO BRIGHTER INC
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MARYS CHOICE RVA
  • Who funds ACTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds LAKE PARK FRIENDS LTD

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County IncWI23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Barbara and John Trimble Family Foundation Inc · Herb Kohl Educational Foundation Inc · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Marcia & Kent Velde Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Marcia & Kent Velde Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Marcia & Kent Velde Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph