Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Maranatha Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$357kEducation$227kYouth Development$5kHealth$2kHousing & Shelter$1kPhilanthropy$1k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMMAUS UNIVERSITY$75,000
EMMAUS WORLDWIDE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WILLOW VALLEY COMMUNITIES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%WATER STREET MISSION: $500 → 9%WATER STREET MISSION: $500 → 9%WATER STREET MISSION: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$575k · 8 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$575k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+14%

Still filing today

50%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EB
    EMMAUS BIBLE COLLEGE
    5× · 2019–2025 · $220k · revenue +16%
  • AF
    ASSOCIATES FOR BIBLICAL RESEARCH
    4× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +63%
  • WS
    WATER STREET MINISTRIES
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • TE
    THE EZEKIEL PROJECT
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • HC
    HIS Camps Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • WV
    WILLOW VALLEY COMMUNITIES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Emmaus Ministries

Provides non-denominational education, and other activities including school for bible study, lecture series, seminars and retreats, all designed to increase the understanding of the bible.

Religion
2
Restation Fellowship in Messiah

Religious studies

Religion
3
Ellerslie Mission Society dba the Church at Ellerslie

To train and equip Christian leaders

Religion
4
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
5
Sacra Script Ministries

Sacra Script Ministries is a Christian ministry whose principal activity is teaching and explaining the Bible. This includes presenting various courses and seminars and producing and distributing Bible study materials, including audio,…

Religion
6
Charis Bible College Inc

Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.

Religion
7
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
8
Eternity Bible College

As an institution of christian higher education, eternity bible college exists to glorify god through graduates whose lives are transformed by rigorous study of the bible as scripture, empassioned love for god, and gracious service in the…

Education
9
Jerusalem Seminary

Motivated by the knowledge that the Word of the Lord will go forth from Jerusalem to the Nations, and guided by a commitment to read the New Testament in its first century context, Jerusalem Seminary provides cutting-edge ministry training…

Religion
10
Emmaus Institute for Biblical Studies

The emmaus institute exists to lead god's people to deeper conversion through a life-giving encounter with god in his word.

Religion
11
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
12
The Bible Seminary

To foster biblical literacy through studies of all 66 books of the bible, cultivate professional and lay leadership skills, and deploy trained christian disciples in service worldwide.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emmaus Bible College; the most unlike its peers is The Ezekiel Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $241,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEMMAUS BIBLE COLLEGE: $220,000 · OtherEMMAUS BIBLE COLLEGEMOUNTAIN RIDGE BIBLE CHAPEL: $18,000 · Other+4 more: $13,800 · OtherPAUSE MINISTRIES INC: $78,000 · ReligionPAUSE MINISTRIE…ECS Ministries: $5,000 · ReligionECS MinistriesASSOCIATES FOR BIBLICAL RESEARCH: $5,000 · EducationTHE EZEKIEL PROJECT: $5,000 · EmploymentHIS Camps Inc: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentWATER STREET MINISTRIES: $1,100 · Human ServicesWILLOW VALLEY COMMUNITIES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$492,800Religion$83,000Education$5,000Employment$5,000Youth Development$5,000Human Services$2,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEMMAUS BIBLE COLLEGE: $220,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPAUSE MINISTRIES INC: $78,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetECS Ministries: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetASSOCIATES FOR BIBLICAL RESEARCH: $5,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHIS Camps Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWATER STREET MINISTRIES: $1,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILLOW VALLEY COMMUNITIES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMMAUS BIBLE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PAUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ECS Ministries ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATES FOR BIBLICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds THE EZEKIEL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds HIS Camps Inc ↗
  • Who funds WATER STREET MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WILLOW VALLEY COMMUNITIES CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Believers Stewardship Services IncIA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Believers Stewardship Services Inc · Perrin Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Maranatha Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Maranatha Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maranatha’s filings →

    More from the funding graph