Skip to content

· Private foundation

The MacKenzie Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$435k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.5MRecreation & Sports$332kYouth Development$314kEducation$148kInternational$115kCommunity Improvement$111kEnvironment$85kHousing & Shelter$84kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $195k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRIST CHURCH OF OAK BROOK$125,000
GREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION$70,000
YOUNG LIFE FOUNDATION$34,500
CHICAGO FELLOWSHIP$26,400
BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTISTRIES$20,000
SUNSHINE GOSPEL MINISTRIES$20,000
BY THE HAND$20,000
ROCKFORD CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$19,000
GREEN LAKE RENEWAL$10,000
HOPE INTERNATIONAL$10,000
GO CHURCH$10,000
CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Caddie & Leadership Academy$5,500
DM STEARNS MISSIONARY FUND INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELPING HANDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%CIRCLE URBAN MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%CIRCLE URBAN MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
WI
PA
CA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
OK
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 32 repeat orgs$418k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
23

Total granted

$2.3M
$396k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+20%

Still filing today

59%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationReligionCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $230k · revenue +139%
  • SG
    SUNSHINE GOSPEL MINISTRIES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $98k · revenue +20%
  • GL
    GREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $85k · revenue +425%

Funded once

  • NA
    NORTH AUSTIN COMMUNITY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue ×19
  • AL
    AGC LTD
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -66%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arise Chicago

Arise chicago builds partnerships between faith communities and workers to fight workplace injustice through education, organizing, and advocating for public policy changes.

Employment
2
Thrive Chicago Nfp

Thrive chicago's mission is to prepare chicago's youth for a vibrant future by aligning efforts and outcomes from cradle to career.

Human Services
3
Chicago Christian Counseling Center

To promote healing and wholeness through professional counseling, consultation and education from a Christian perspective

Health
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
6
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
7
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
8
Youth Conference Ministries Inc

To develop youth servant leaders who will share the message of jesus christ with their peers.

Youth Development
9
Chicago Religious Leadership Network On Latin America

Crln builds partnerships among social movements and organized communities within and between the u.s. and latin america. we are united by our liberating faiths and inspired by the power of people to find allies to work for sustainable…

Religion
10
Club Christ Ministries

Our vision is to empower urban youth to transform their communities for christ through a combination of community based education programs. we send a second shift of educators to teach and mentor urban youth.

Education
11
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
12
Unity Christian Academy

Empowering a diverse community, united by christ, to achieve excellence in education for the flourishing of all creation.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Together Chicago Inc; the most unlike its peers is Young Athletes With Hope Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
26/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST CHURCH OF OAK BROOK: $801,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH OF OAK BROOKBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $230,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INCYOUNG LIFE FOUNDATION: $192,500 · OtherYOUNG LIFE FOUNDATIONGO CHURCH INC: $180,000 · OtherGO CHURCH INCSUNSHINE GOSPEL MINISTRIES: $98,000 · OtherBy The Hand Club For Kids: $83,000 · OtherBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $81,000 · Other+36 more: $297,600 · Other+36 moreNORTH AUSTIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $250,000 · Community ImprovementNORTH AUSTI…Green Lake Renewal Inc: $20,000 · Community ImprovementGreen Lake …TOGETHER CHICAGO INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementTOGETHER CH…CHICAGO FELLOWSHIP: $118,400 · ReligionKIDS ACROSS AMERICA: $10,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,500 · ReligionAGC LTD: $50,000 · InternationalHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · InternationalALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL: $21,000 · InternationalFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED: $8,000 · InternationalCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $55,000 · EducationThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $12,000 · EducationCHICAGO EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 · EducationROCKFORD CHRISTIAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · EducationMetanoia Ukraine: $5,000 · EducationGREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $85,000 · EnvironmentIntentional Sports: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE FIRST TEE OF CHICAGO FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,963,100Community Improvement$290,000Religion$129,900International$104,000Education$87,000Environment$85,000Recreation & Sports$85,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $230,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCHICAGO FELLOWSHIP: $118,400 over 6y, 12% of budgetSUNSHINE GOSPEL MINISTRIES: $98,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetGREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $85,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetBy The Hand Club For Kids: $83,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $81,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetIntentional Sports: $75,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAGC LTD: $50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL: $21,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE BIBLE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreen Lake Renewal Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTOGETHER CHICAGO INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGRIP OUTREACH FOR YOUTH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHELPING HANDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHICAGO EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF CHICAGO FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCIRCLE URBAN MINISTRIES: $8,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROCKFORD CHRISTIAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMetanoia Ukraine: $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetALTAR FLY FISHING: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHATTANEUTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG ATHLETES WITH HOPE NFP: $1,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetABUNDANT LIFE REVIVAL MINISTRIES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHRASHER OPERA HOUSE CORPORATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEL AYUDANTE MISSIONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINDS MATTER OF CHICAGO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH AUSTIN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE GOSPEL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds GREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds By The Hand Club For Kids ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Intentional Sports ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds AGC LTD ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds Green Lake Renewal Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds GRIP OUTREACH FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF CHICAGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE URBAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds FLORESTA USA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ROCKFORD CHRISTIAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Metanoia Ukraine ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Code Family FoundationIL24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Code Family Foundation · Hallene Family Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Andersen-Formolo Family Foundation · Kehe Cares Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The US Charitable Gift Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The MacKenzie Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The MacKenzie Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The MacKenzie Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The MacKenzie Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on MacKenzie Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph