Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Macauley Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$640k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$1.1MHealth$1.0MFood & Nutrition$380kReligion$240kHousing & Shelter$193kHuman Services$70kEnvironment$62kPhilanthropy$52kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $357k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $275k
$25,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$9.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICARES FREE CLINICS$175,000
HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
THE DENAN PROJECT INC$50,000
THE KELLERMANN FOUNDATION$33,000
CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT$30,000
SHARE AFRICA$30,000
JOHNS HOPKINS CENTER FOR AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH$30,000
OREGON FOOD BANK$25,000
CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE$25,000
MERCY SHIPS$25,000
HAWAII FOODBANK$25,000
FRATERNITE NOTRE DAME$24,000
FAMILY PROMISE$20,000
GOOD COUNSEL INC$20,000
AMERICARES$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $30k → 15%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 9%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $30k → 15%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 9%GOOD COUNSEL: $20k → 14%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $30k → 15%GOOD COUNSEL INC: $20k → 14%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $30k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OR
OH
NJ
CT
CO
KY
VA
MD
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 23 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
2

Total granted

$3.1M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $875k · revenue +109%
  • HH
    HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $255k · revenue +69%
  • KF
    Kellermann Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $153k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • PC
    PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • FS
    FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
2
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
3
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
4
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
5
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
7
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
8
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
9
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
10
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
11
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haitian Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Good Counsel Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE DENAN PROJECT INC: $320,000 · InternationalTHE DENAN PROJECT INCHAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $255,000 · InternationalHAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATIONKellermann Foundation: $153,000 · InternationalKellermann FoundationAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $63,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCEL PORVENIR: $62,000 · InternationalEL PORVENIRMercy Ships International: $40,000 · International+1 more: $25,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC: $875,000 · HealthAMERICARES FREE CLINICS INCSHARE AFRICA: $138,000 · OtherSHARE AFRICACONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $135,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INCFRATERNITE NOTRE DAME INC: $120,000 · OtherFRATERNITE NOTRE DAME INCOREGON FOOD BANK: $120,000 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKRESTAVEK FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $59,000 · OtherRESTAVEK FREEDOM FOUNDATI…GOOD COUNSEL HOMES INC: $48,000 · OtherGOOD COUNSEL HOMES INCTHE DANANG PROJECT: $47,500 · OtherTHE DANANG PROJECTMCC OF THE PALM BEACHES: $30,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesGOOD COUNSEL INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LYNCHBURG: $18,521 · EducationHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $105,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionFAMILY PROMISE INC: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterEDUCATION AND HOPE INC: $52,000 · Philanthropy
International$918,000Health$875,000Other$697,500Human Services$205,000Education$168,521Food & Nutrition$125,000Housing & Shelter$100,000Philanthropy$52,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC: $875,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetTHE DENAN PROJECT INC: $320,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetHAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $255,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetKellermann Foundation: $153,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $135,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $120,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $105,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $63,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEL PORVENIR: $62,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetRESTAVEK FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $59,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetEDUCATION AND HOPE INC: $52,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetBRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD COUNSEL INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMercy Ships International: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LYNCHBURG: $18,521 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DENAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Kellermann Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII FOODBANK INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EL PORVENIR ↗
  • Who funds RESTAVEK FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION AND HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD COUNSEL INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LYNCHBURG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Macauley Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Macauley Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Family Promise Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Macauley’s filings →

More from the funding graph