Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Lucille & Joseph Block Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$128kPhilanthropy$90kHuman Services$35kEducation$27kScience & Tech$23kEnvironment$18kCivil Rights$16kYouth Development$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$240k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$10,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY - THE BLOCK MUSEUM LEADERSHIP CIRCLE$5,000
AIDS FOUNDATION OF CHICAGO$5,000
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$4,500
RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION$3,500
THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$3,000
ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY$3,000
NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER$3,000
FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$2,500
THE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE & INDUSTRY$2,500
LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO$2,500
CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY (DBA - CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN)$2,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$2,000
CHICAGO COMMONS ASSOCIATION$1,000
CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC (WBEZ)$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS: $1k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS: $1k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS: $1k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS: $1k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS: $1k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$400k · 26 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
1

Total granted

$400k
$500

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsEnvironmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +13%
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +38%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • W
    WYCC
    one grant, 2017 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc

The Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University ("The Auditorium"), an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, is committed to presenting the finest in international, cultural, community and educational programming to Chicago and to the…

Arts & Culture
3
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
4
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
5
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
6
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
7
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
8
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
9
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
10
Chicago Zoological Society

To inspire conservation leadership by connecting people with wildlife and nature.

Animals
11
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
12
Northwestern University

Northwestern is committed to excellent teaching, innovative research and the personal and intellectual growth of its students in a diverse academic community.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society and the most unlike its peers is Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $33,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRoosevelt University — $27,000 · OtherRoosevelt UniversityIndividual grant recipient — $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND IND — $10,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDLYRIC OPERA — $10,000 · OtherLYRIC OPERACHICAGO LYRIC OPERA — $10,000 · OtherCHICAGO LYRIC OPERATHE ARK — $9,000 · OtherTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHIC — $9,000 · OtherCHICAGO HISTORY MUSEUM — $8,000 · OtherWBEZ — $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherJEWISH COUNSEL OF YOUTH SERVICES — $6,000 · OtherJEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES — $8,000 · Other+8 more — $18,000 · Other+8 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $90,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF ME…RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $17,500 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FESTIVAL AS…FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $15,000 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM OF NAT…Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $12,500 · Arts & CultureKenneth C Griffin M…WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $9,000 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD…MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $9,000 · Arts & CultureMERIT SCHOOL OF MUS…Chicago Symphony Orchestra — $4,500 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony Or…Lyric Opera of Chicago — $2,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER — $26,000 · Human ServicesChicago Commons Association — $7,000 · Human ServicesTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $18,000 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $16,000 · Civil RightsCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $16,000 · Environment
Other$178,000Philanthropy$90,000Arts & Culture$71,000Human Services$33,000Education$18,000Civil Rights$16,000Environment$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRoosevelt University — $27,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER — $26,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO — $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY — $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Commons Association — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS Foundation of Chicago — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra — $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
  • Who funds Roosevelt University
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY
  • Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • Who funds MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC
  • Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES
  • Who funds Chicago Commons Association
  • Who funds AIDS Foundation of Chicago
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra
  • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago
  • Who funds CHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Lucille & Joseph Block Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph