Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lucille & Joseph Block Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$128kPhilanthropy$90kHuman Services$35kEducation$27kScience & Tech$23kEnvironment$18kCivil Rights$16kYouth Development$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$240k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$10,000
AIDS FOUNDATION OF CHICAGO$5,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY - THE BLOCK MUSEUM LEADERSHIP CIRCLE$5,000
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$4,500
RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION$3,500
ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY$3,000
THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$3,000
NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER$3,000
THE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE & INDUSTRY$2,500
FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$2,500
LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO$2,500
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$2,000
CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY (DBA - CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN)$2,000
CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC (WBEZ)$1,000
MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS: $1k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS: $1k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS: $1k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS: $1k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS: $1k → 14%CHICAGO COMMONS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$400k · 26 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
1

Total granted

$400k
$500

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +13%
  • NS
    NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26k · revenue +38%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • W
    WYCC
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc

The Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University ("The Auditorium"), an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, is committed to presenting the finest in international, cultural, community and educational programming to Chicago and to the…

Arts & Culture
3
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
4
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
5
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
6
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
7
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
8
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
9
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
10
Chicago Zoological Society

To inspire conservation leadership by connecting people with wildlife and nature.

Animals
11
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
12
Northwestern University

Northwestern is committed to excellent teaching, innovative research and the personal and intellectual growth of its students in a diverse academic community.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Horticultural Society; the most unlike its peers is Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $33,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRoosevelt University: $27,000 · OtherRoosevelt UniversityIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND IND: $10,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDLYRIC OPERA: $10,000 · OtherLYRIC OPERACHICAGO LYRIC OPERA: $10,000 · OtherCHICAGO LYRIC OPERATHE ARK: $9,000 · OtherTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHIC: $9,000 · OtherCHICAGO HISTORY MUSEUM: $8,000 · OtherWBEZ: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherJEWISH COUNSEL OF YOUTH SERVICES: $6,000 · OtherJEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $8,000 · Other+8 more: $18,000 · Other+8 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $90,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF ME…RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $17,500 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FESTIVAL AS…FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM OF NAT…Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $12,500 · Arts & CultureKenneth C Griffin M…WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD…MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureMERIT SCHOOL OF MUS…Chicago Symphony Orchestra: $4,500 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony Or…Lyric Opera of Chicago: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $26,000 · Human ServicesChicago Commons Association: $7,000 · Human ServicesTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $18,000 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $16,000 · Civil RightsCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $16,000 · Environment
Other$178,000Philanthropy$90,000Arts & Culture$71,000Human Services$33,000Education$18,000Civil Rights$16,000Environment$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRoosevelt University: $27,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $26,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Commons Association: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS Foundation of Chicago: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Roosevelt University ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Commons Association ↗
  • Who funds AIDS Foundation of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds Lyric Opera of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lucille & Joseph Block Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lucille & Joseph Block Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lucille & Joseph Block’s filings →

    More from the funding graph