Skip to content
The Lozier Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Lozier Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49M
Granted FY2024still arriving
450
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$57MPhilanthropy$39MHuman Services$23MHealth$22MHousing & Shelter$18MYouth Development$12MCrime & Legal$9.8MCommunity Improvement$7.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 450 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k107 grants · $424k
  • $10k–50k134 grants · $3.2M
  • $50k–250k152 grants · $14M
  • $250k+57 grants · $32M
$38,400
Median grant
16
States reached
$437M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRONT PORCH INVESTMENTS$2,000,000
MENTAL HEALTH INNOVATION FOUNDATION$2,000,000
BLACK POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF OMAHA$1,500,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$1,250,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$1,100,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$1,048,000
NEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000,000
COLLEGE OF ST MARY$1,000,000
YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC$1,000,000
COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE$1,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$1,000,000
WOMENS FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC$800,000
HOPEWELL FUND$600,000
WOMENS FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC$540,000
OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION INC$500,387
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $37.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHARLES E LAKIN HUMAN SERVICES CAMPUS FOUNDATION: $500k → 12%CHARLES E LAKIN HUMAN SERVICES CAMPUS FOUNDATION: $500k → 12%KID'S CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $1.5M → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $1.0M → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $300k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $215k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $260k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $250k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $210k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $210k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $500k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $500k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $1.5M → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $800k → 12%WOMENS FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC: $800k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $735k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $735k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $720k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $625k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $540k → 12%WOMENS FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC: $540k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $500k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $400k → 12%WOMENS FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC: $400k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $246k → 12%WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA: $235k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $200k → 12%COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $1.0M → 12%JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS - NE: $625k → 12%JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS - NE: $350k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $250k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $223k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $220k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL CENTER: $200k → 12%CHILDREN'S RESPITE CARE: $200k → 12%CHILDRENS RESPITE CARE CENTER INC: $200k → 12%PROJECT HOUSEWORKS: $300k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $1.0M → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $1.0M → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $500k → 12%WOMENS CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $450k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $325k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $325k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $325k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $275k → 12%FINANCIAL HOPE COLLABORATIVE: $250k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $250k → 12%ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $250k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
VA
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173M · 383 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

383 repeat relationships: 194 still active in FY2024, 189 since wound down; 113 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

383
210

Total granted

$173M
$8.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+29%

Still filing today

59%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $13M · revenue +70%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.5M · revenue +67%
  • NM
    NEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2024 · $4.6M · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • CP
    CREIGHTON PREPARATORY SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2020 · $750k
  • LC
    LAKE CUNNINGHAM DEVELOPMENT TRUST
    one grant, 2021 · $750k · revenue -87%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2019 · $630k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Omaha Collective

To build the capacity of youth serving organizations, service providers, families and community to claim their voice, cultivate healing and take courageous action to improve their overall health and well being.

Human Services
2
Community Justice Center

A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.

Crime & Legal
3
Omaha ForUs Inc

Omaha forus builds intentional community and creates equitable space in service to lgbtq+ individuals and families of eastern nebraska and western iowa.

Human Services
4
Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce

To increase business, employment, and investment in the greater omaha area.

—
5
Nebraska Credit Union League Inc

To promote credit unions in nebraska

—
6
Nebraska Votes

The organization's purpose is to ensure a fair and modern democracy in nebraska through research, education, and advocacy for policies and practices that promote participation in democracy.

Civil Rights
7
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
8
Nebraska Realtors Association

Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members

—
9
Nebraska Community College Assoc

Support for community colleges

—
10
Nebraska Vocational Agricultural Foundation

Nonprofit corporation which provides leadership development and enhancement through educational programs and opportunities for community involvement.

Youth Development
11
Leading Age Nebraska

The organization's mission is to expand the world of possibilities for aging through advocacy, collaboration, and education.

Housing & Shelter
12
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Bridges Out of Poverty Inc; the most unlike its peers is Outride fka the Specialized Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

376 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 376 of the 716 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

40
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
119
Early backer (in before they grew)
360/376
Grantees still filing
236/376
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $13,312,705 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA…COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $5,489,015 · EducationCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARYMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3,671,810 · EducationMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY…Collective For Youth: $2,175,000 · EducationSIMPLE FOUNDATION: $1,740,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA: $1,725,000 · EducationPHOENIX ACADEMY DAY SCHOOL: $1,605,000 · EducationAVENUE SCHOLARS: $1,600,000 · EducationCreighton University: $1,534,700 · Education+17 more: $8,081,027 · Education+17 moreWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC: $8,913,055 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S FUND OF GREA…KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $3,927,530 · Human ServicesKIDS CAN COMMUNITY C…WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $3,880,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER FOR A…JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA: $2,339,330 · Human ServicesJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIG…YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $1,690,000 · Human ServicesCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $1,600,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $1,547,500 · Human ServicesCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $1,390,000 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $1,351,000 · Human Services+24 more: $10,902,482 · Human Services+24 moreOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5,232,095 · OtherOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONMERCY HIGH SCHOOL: $3,916,950 · OtherMERCY HIGH SCHOOLONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $2,219,990 · OtherOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $3,651,064 · OtherOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATIONHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $2,470,100 · Other+93 more: $45,502,884 · Other+93 moreOmaha Community Foundation: $25,454,000 · PhilanthropyOmaha Community F…Front Porch Investments: $2,060,000 · PhilanthropyFront Porch Inves…+9 more: $3,995,000 · Philanthropy+9 moreNEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4,624,032 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH INNOVATION FOUNDATION: $4,000,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES IN OMAHA INC: $1,130,500 · HealthHARBOR HOUSE: $650,000 · HealthCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC: $560,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500,000 · HealthSANTA MONICA INC: $495,000 · Health+7 more: $1,461,256 · HealthHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC: $4,288,000 · Housing & ShelterMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $1,730,000 · Housing & ShelterSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $839,000 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $711,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY HOUSING ADVISORY SERVICES: $580,000 · Housing & Shelter+3 more: $525,000 · Housing & ShelterGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $1,992,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEBRASKA YOUTH JUSTICE INITIATIVE DBA RADIUS: $1,625,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $1,540,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $885,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMPLETELY KIDS: $730,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $675,000 · Youth DevelopmentBANISTER'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $360,000 · Youth Development+3 more: $495,000 · Youth Development
Education$40,934,257Human Services$37,540,897Other$62,993,083Philanthropy$31,509,000Health$13,420,788Housing & Shelter$8,673,000Youth Development$8,302,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOmaha Community Foundation: $25,454,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $13,312,705 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC: $8,913,055 over 8y, 37% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $5,489,015 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $5,232,095 over 8y, 18% of budgetNEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4,624,032 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC: $4,288,000 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH INNOVATION FOUNDATION: $4,000,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $3,927,530 over 6y, 49% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $3,880,000 over 8y, 30% of budgetMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $3,671,810 over 6y, 38% of budgetOMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION: $3,651,064 over 7y, 70% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $2,470,100 over 8y, 79% of budgetJUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA: $2,339,330 over 6y, 13% of budgetONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $2,219,990 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetCollective For Youth: $2,175,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetFront Porch Investments: $2,060,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $1,992,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetBLACK POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF OMA: $1,984,040 over 7y, 92% of budgetSIMPLE FOUNDATION: $1,740,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $1,730,000 over 7y, 32% of budgetCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA: $1,725,000 over 6y, 27% of budgetYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $1,690,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetHOLY NAME HOUSING CORPORATION: $1,657,300 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetNEBRASKA YOUTH JUSTICE INITIATIVE DBA RADIUS: $1,625,000 over 3y, 71% of budgetPHOENIX ACADEMY DAY SCHOOL: $1,605,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetAVENUE SCHOLARS: $1,600,000 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $1,600,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $1,547,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $1,540,500 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetCreighton University: $1,534,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $1,390,000 over 7y, 7.5% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $1,351,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $1,223,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University: $1,200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE: $1,165,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES IN OMAHA INC: $1,130,500 over 5y, 13% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $1,023,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC: $1,000,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCHARLES E LAKIN HUMAN SERVICES CAMPUS FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetOMAHA ZOO FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetPROJECT HARMONY: $998,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetTOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA: $989,750 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetOPENSKY POLICY INSTITUTE: $972,500 over 7y, 38% of budgetINTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $932,358 over 7y, 13% of budgetLEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA: $931,015 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetCHRISTIAN HOME ASSN - CHILDREN'S SQUARE USA: $911,000 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS: $889,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Omaha Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH INNOVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE FOR OUR NEIGHBORS-NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Collective For Youth ↗
  • Who funds Front Porch Investments ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds BLACK POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF OMA ↗
  • Who funds SIMPLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MICAH HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY NAME HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA YOUTH JUSTICE INITIATIVE DBA RADIUS ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX ACADEMY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AVENUE SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
  • Who funds GRIEF'S JOURNEY THE COLLECTIVE FOR HOPE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood Foundati…Weitz Family Foundati…Mutual of Omaha Found…The Hawks FoundationRobert B Daugherty Fo…Peter Kiewit Foundati…The Charles and Mary …United Way of the Mid…Suzanne & Walter Scot…The Holland FoundationNebraska Community Fo…Immanuel Community Vi…
The Sherwood FoundationNE330.2× affinity239 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · United Way of the Midlands · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · The Holland Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lozier Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lozier Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 44%
  • Education Northwest: 44% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
65report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lozier Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Lozier Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 716 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lozier’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home