Skip to content
The Loveall Foundation for Children at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Loveall Foundation for Children

$163k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$222kInternational$70kEducation$56kHealth$50kRecreation & Sports$50kYouth Development$48kHousing & Shelter$14kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $38,710, the rows itemized in this filing. The $163,424 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $124,714 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILD ADVOCATES OF AUBURN$10,000
NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION$10,000
BERGEN CATHOLIC GOLF OUTING$7,500
HEARTS LANDING RANCH$6,000
STANFORD SIERRA YOUTH & FAMILIES$5,210
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $231k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILD ADVOCATES OF AUBURN: $10k → 6%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION INC: $20k → 14%SOUTH PACIFIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $110k → 9%CHILD ADVOCATES: $8k → 6%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION INC: $20k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $8k → 17%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $6k → 17%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 14%CHILD ADVOCATES OF PLACER COUNTY: $15k → 6%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 14%CASA OF SACRAMENTO: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
AR
HI
AL

Grants abroad, by region: $32k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Russia and Neighboring States$30k · 94%

Stated purpose: DIRECT CASH ASST. FOR DISPLACED Ukrainians

East Asia and the Pacific$2k · 6%

Stated purpose: DIRECT CASH ASSISTANCE FOR CHILDREN

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$284k · 8 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$284k
$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+39%

Still filing today

88%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsInternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $70k · revenue +9%
  • Best Buddies International Inc
    2× · 2017–2019 · $70k · revenue +81%
  • SP
    Sunburst Projects
    5× · 2019–2023 · $41k · revenue +229%

Funded once

  • SP
    SOUTH PACIFIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $110k · revenue -90%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $27k · revenue +39%
  • DM
    De Marillac Academy
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Youth Center of San Francisco

Our mission is to encourage a diverse population of high-need young people to explore their full potential through academic, career, family, and community life. Every year, CYC impacts over 8,000 San Francisco youth and their families,…

—
2
Horizons for Youth

Horizons for Youth mission is to transform children's lives by providing targeted resources, rooted in education, in a trusting partnership with their families and communities.

Youth Development
3
New Pathways for Youth

At New Pathways for Youth, we are building a future where every young person can live their life with joy and purpose, confident in their ability to decide their own path. To make it happen, we are transforming the lives of youth by…

Crime & Legal
4
Boys Hope Girls Hope of San Francisco

Boys Hope Girls Hope nurtures and guides motivated young people in need to become well-educated, career-ready men and women for others. Offering direct educational programming and support as well as college admission assistance and…

—
5
Los Angeles Youth Network

Youth Emerging Stronger (YES) empowers young people, between ages of 12 and 24 within Los Angeles County, including but not limited to run-away and homeless youth. YES mission is to end homelessness one youth at a time to become…

Human Services
6
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Bay Area

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
7
Youth Policy Institute Inc

Youth policy institute (ypi) transforms los angeles neighborhoods, reducing poverty by offering cradle to college & career services.

—
8
Youthbuild Charter School of California

Our mission is to cultivate collaborative learning communities in which every student has the right to an authentic education, plays a meaningful role in creating a positive social change, and becomes and active participant in working…

Education
9
Youth Homes

The mission of youth homes is to help every youth feel safe, have a sense of belonging, and find a place to call home.

Human Services
10
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Utah

Big brothers big sisters of utah's vision is that all children achieve success in life. our mission is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Education
11
Youth Guidance

A leader in social and emotional development, community engagement, and positive youth development, Youth Guidance has strategically created programs to address community needs across four delivery areas: Community & Afterschool Programs…

Education
12
A Bridge for Kids

To build bridges to brighter futures for teenagers who have big aspirations but face barriers to achieving their full potential. provides financial benefits to teenagers based on applications demonstrating need and a worthy activity that…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Hearts Landing Ranch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTH PACIFIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $109,644 · Human ServicesSOUTH PACIFIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONNEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $70,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATIONCASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter: $32,500 · Human ServicesCASA of Placer Yuba and SutterCOVENANT HOUSE: $14,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE+1 more: $5,200 · Human ServicesSunburst Projects: $40,890 · OtherSunburst ProjectsDe Marillac Academy: $25,000 · OtherDe Marillac AcademyEUREKA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20,000 · OtherEUREKA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICTSTANDFORD SIERRA: $10,420 · OtherSTANDFORD SIERRABOBBY PORTIS CHARITY: $10,000 · OtherBOBBY PORTIS CHARITYMOSAIC LAW CONGREGATION: $10,000 · OtherMOSAIC LAW CONGREGATIONRIDE TO WALK INC: $9,000 · OtherRIDE TO WALK INCBERGEN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $7,500 · OtherBERGEN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLBest Buddies International Inc: $70,000 · InternationalBest Buddies In…Fairytale Town Inc: $36,149 · Recreation & SportsFairytale…Stephen J Wampler Foundation Camp WAMP: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsStephen J…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $27,000 · Youth DevelopmentAIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL: $10,513 · EducationHEARTS LANDING RANCH: $6,000 · Animals
Human Services$231,344Other$132,810International$70,000Recreation & Sports$42,149Youth Development$27,000Education$10,513Animals$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTH PACIFIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $109,644 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $70,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSunburst Projects: $40,890 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetFairytale Town Inc: $36,149 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter: $32,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $27,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL: $10,513 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRIDE TO WALK INC: $9,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetStephen J Wampler Foundation Camp WAMP: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHEARTS LANDING RANCH: $6,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCharity Navigator: $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Help-A-Child Foundati…Placer Community Foun…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Help-A-Child FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Help-A-Child Foundation · Placer Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Loveall Foundation for Children funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Loveall Foundation for Children. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Loveall Foundation for Children?

Find your warmest path to The Loveall Foundation for Children through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Loveall Foundation for Children’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home