Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Help-A-Child Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$444k
Granted FY2021
9
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Health$258kPhilanthropy$187kHuman Services$56kRecreation & Sports$46kHousing & Shelter$32kCrime & Legal$3kEducation$2kReligion$750Other$0
02FY2021 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $291k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVER OAK CENTER FOR CHILDREN$150,000
WILLOW VIEW ASSOCIATION$79,750
WILLOW VIEW ASSOCIATION$61,642
UC DAVIS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$47,500
JDRF$25,000
MARYS HOUSE$25,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$22,500
CHILDRENS RECEIVING HOME OF SACRAMENTO$17,500
ST JOHNS SHELTER$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILD ADVOCATES OF PLACER COUNTY: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$387k · 9 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
17

Total granted

$387k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+63%

Still filing today

44%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
HealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    River Oak Center for Children
    5× · 2017–2021 · $201k · revenue +9%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $31k · revenue +38%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • FT
    Fairytale Town Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +30%
  • FC
    FRANKLIN CONKLIN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +63%
  • M
    MARYHOUSE
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Star View Children and Family Services

Starview children & family services provides social and mental health services in california. the services provided will embody a commitment to high clinical standards and quality improvements to assist clients to achieve their maximum…

Human Services
2
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
3
Wayfinder Family Services

The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…

Human Services
4
Youth for Change

Youth For Change (YFC) mission is to enhance the well being of children, families, individuals, and communities.

Human Services
5
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
6
KidsFirst Child Abuse Prevention Council of Placer County

Our mission is to end child abuse and neglect through educating, advocating, and counseling to empower and strengthen children and families. Our vision is that all children live in a safe, healthy, and nurturing environment.

Crime & Legal
7
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
8
The Childrens House

To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.

9
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
10
Family Access Fighting for Childrens Rights
11
A Shared Vision Partners in Pediatric Blindness and Visual Imp

A Shared Vision educates, inspires, and empowers families to nurture the development of their young children who are blind or visually impaired. We provide early intervention vision services in families' homes and community settings…

Health
12
Family Care Network Inc

The mission of the Family Care Network is to enhance the wellbeing of children, adults, and families in partnership with our community.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Placer Yuba and Sutter and the most unlike its peers is Willow View Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

River Oak Center for Children — $200,950 · HealthRiver Oak Center for Children+2 more — $2,500 · HealthUC DAVIS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — $51,000 · OtherUC DAVIS CHILDRENS HOSPITALJDRF — $41,000 · OtherJDRFST JOHNS SHELTER — $31,000 · OtherST JOHNS SHELTERChildrens Receiving Home of Sacramento — $25,500 · OtherChildrens Receiving Home of Sacramen…MARYS HOUSE — $25,000 · OtherMARYS HOUSE+14 more — $14,246 · Other+14 moreWILLOW VIEW ASSOCIATION — $141,392 · PhilanthropyWILLOW VIEW ASSOCIATIONFRANKLIN CONKLIN FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropySPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $31,000 · Recreation & SportsFairytale Town Inc — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsCASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter — $1,000 · Human ServicesFamily Promise of Sacramento — $1,000 · Education
Health$203,450Other$187,746Philanthropy$146,392Recreation & Sports$46,000Human Services$1,000Education$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRiver Oak Center for Children — $200,950 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetWILLOW VIEW ASSOCIATION — $141,392 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $31,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Receiving Home of Sacramento — $25,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFairytale Town Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIDE TO WALK INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlbie Aware Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds River Oak Center for Children
  • Who funds WILLOW VIEW ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
  • Who funds Childrens Receiving Home of Sacramento
  • Who funds Fairytale Town Inc
  • Who funds FRANKLIN CONKLIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds RIDE TO WALK INC
  • Who funds CASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter
  • Who funds Family Promise of Sacramento
  • Who funds Albie Aware Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · The Loveall Foundation for Children · Teichert Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Help-A-Child Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Help-A-Child Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Help-A-Child Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph