Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Louis Stewart Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$253k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$904kHuman Services$588kInternational$122kHealth$53kEducation$38kArts & Culture$13kCommunity Improvement$5kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $201k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICAN DONOR FUND$101,000
RAINFOREST TRUST$100,000
SAVING NATURE$30,000
MAYO CLINIC$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANADIAN NATURE$3,000
PAMS FOUNDATION INC$2,000
HADLEY SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND$2,000
CABLE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM$2,000
NORTHSHORE HOSPITALS FOUNDATION$1,000
NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$1,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FILM DEPARTMENT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 65% of grant dollars ($1.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 35% that went abroad ($600k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 27% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAYO CLINIC: $10k → 9%PAMS FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 18%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANADIAN NATURE: $3k → 13%AMERICANS FOR OXFORD: $8k → 17%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $90k → 14%THE BAHAMAS NATIONAL TRUST FUND INC: $2k → 13%ABACO MEDICAL RELIEF FUND INC: $5k → 14%CABLE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM: $2k → 11%SAVING NATURE: $30k → 11%HADLEY SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 14%RAINFOREST TRUST: $100k → 6%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $56k → 9%MAYO CLINIC: $10k → 9%PAMS FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 18%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $40k → 14%CABLE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM: $2k → 11%SAVING NATURE: $30k → 11%HADLEY SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 14%RAINFOREST TRUST: $98k → 6%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $32k → 9%MAYO CLINIC: $10k → 9%PAMS FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 18%CHAPEL AND YORK US FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $35k → 14%CABLE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM: $2k → 11%SAVING NATURE: $20k → 11%HADLEY SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND: $2k → 14%RAINFOREST TRUST: $90k → 6%MAYO CLINIC: $10k → 9%PAMS FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 18%TED FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 17%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $30k → 14%CABLE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM: $2k → 11%SAVING NATURE: $20k → 11%RAINFOREST TRUST: $75k → 6%PAMS FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 18%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $10k → 14%SAVING NATURE: $15k → 11%RAINFOREST TRUST: $60k → 6%PAMS FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 18%FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $4k → 14%RAINFOREST TRUST: $50k → 6%PAMS FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 18%RAINFOREST TRUST: $50k → 6%PAMS FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 18%RAINFOREST TRUST: $40k → 6%NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM EVANSTON HOSPITAL: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
CA
VA
NC
DC
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 35% of all-years giving ($600k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$588k · 6 grants
Bahamas$12k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of The Louis Stewart Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Louis Stewart Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 12 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$1.6M
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+31%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    RAINFOREST TRUST
    8× · 2017–2025 · $563k · revenue +100%
  • FF
    FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $209k · revenue +654%
  • SN
    SAVING NATURE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $115k · revenue +462%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +17%
  • TF
    TED FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +31%
  • AM
    ABACO MEDICAL RELIEF FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources - Us

Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.

Environment
2
American Friends of Canadian Conservation

To protect and to promote the protection of the ecological integrity and other conservation values of the natural areas of canada through securement of fee title and less than fee interests in land and support of canadian conservation…

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
5
International Conservation Fund Corp

Preservation and conservation of natural ecosystems and biodiversity worldwide.

Environment
6
Natura International Inc

Natura International conserves rainforests and other key natural ecosystems and the endangered species they contain through creation of protected areas in collaboration with local governments and communities in Latin America. In this way…

Public Benefit
7
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
8
Nature Trust of the Americas Inc
Philanthropy
9
Blue Investments for Nature Inc

Blue investments for nature, inc. (bin) is a nonprofit corporation whose sole member and supported organization is the nature conservancy (tnc). tnc is a longstanding section 501(c)(3) public charity organized and operated for the…

Environment
10
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
11
The Johnsie Fiock Fildes Nature Foundation Ltd
Environment
12
The Nature Institute
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Endeavor Health Clinical Operations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICAN DONOR FUND: $588,000 · OtherCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICAN DONOR FUN…MAYO CLINIC: $40,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC+7 more: $39,500 · Other+7 moreRAINFOREST TRUST: $563,000 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRUSTPAMS FOUNDATION INC: $34,000 · InternationalPAMS FOUNDATION INCFAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $209,000 · PhilanthropyFAUNA & FLORA INTER…CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $87,805 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUND…+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropySAVING NATURE INC: $115,000 · Environment+2 more: $5,000 · EnvironmentHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $8,500 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $8,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $5,000 · EducationCABLE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM INC: $12,500 · Arts & CultureTED FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $1,000 · Health
Other$667,500International$597,000Philanthropy$301,805Environment$120,000Education$21,500Arts & Culture$12,500Community Improvement$5,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $563,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $209,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetSAVING NATURE INC: $115,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $87,805 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAMS FOUNDATION INC: $34,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCABLE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM INC: $12,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTED FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANADIAN NATURE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBahamas National Trust Fund Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVING NATURE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds PAMS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CABLE NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANADIAN NATURE INC ↗
  • Who funds Bahamas National Trust Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Louis Stewart Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Louis Stewart Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Louis Stewart Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Louis Stewart Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Louis Stewart’s filings →

    More from the funding graph