· Private foundation
Orona Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $79k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALWAYS DREAM FOUNDATION | $61,070 |
| ON-LOK SENIOR CENTER | $45,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $13,000 |
| ACCESS INSTITUTE | $11,086 |
| BREAKTHROUGH SILICON VALLEY CHILDRE | $10,225 |
| KLOVE RADIO CHRISTIAN BROADCAST | $8,000 |
| COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH | $5,000 |
| BRUCE LEE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| FOODBANK CONTRA COSTA COUNTY | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL FUND FIRST RESPONDERS | $3,635 |
| SUNSET YOUTH SERVICES | $2,675 |
| A TO Z PSHCHOTHERAPY CENTER | $2,058 |
| META PAYPAL ALTADENA FIRE VICTIMS | $2,041 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $1,567 |
| BEST FRIENDS | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES3× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +37%- RHRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC3× · 2021–2024 · $7k · revenue +6%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc2× · 2024–2025 · $927 · revenue +10%
Funded once
- JRJESSIE REES FOUNDATION-CHILDRENS CANCER RESEARCH FUNDone grant, 2020 · $7k
- GFGO FUND ME - LAHAINA HI FIREone grant, 2023 · $6k
- JRJESSIE REES FOUNDATION CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Kaiser foundation for the advancement of integrated health care is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) advocacy organization to engage in proactive advocacy to promote understanding of the benefits of integrated care and coverage, and support of the…
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
The mission is to build health equity in silicon valley.
Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.
To provide life long professional services to support all people with hearing or communication challenges in achieving their goals.
Alohacare is a hawaii corporation that contracts with the state of hawaii, department of human services med-quest division to provide managed health care in accordance with the state of hawaii health quest demonstration, and with the…
The mission of the healthcare association of hawaii is to be hawaii's most effective advocate for the comprehensive and financially strong healthcare system that successfully responds to the diverse and changing needs of all we serve.
To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.
To improve the health and well-being of our community.
To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hayward Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CROCKER ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Access Institute for Psychological Services ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRUCE LEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
- Who funds Golden State Opportunity ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds HRJ CHARITIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Orona Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Orona Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Orona Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.