Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lindgren Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$283kInternational$192kAnimals$149kHealth$119k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $130k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN$130,000
ST THOMAS MOORE HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$5,000
MEOW VILLAGE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOLY CROSS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $5k → 11%HOLY CROSS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $15k → 20%INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $130k → 14%WILDCAT HAVEN: $35k → 8%HOLY CROSS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $5k → 12%MEOW VILLAGE: $21k → 14%WILDCAT RIDGE: $40k → 3%ST THOMAS MOORE HIGH SCHOOL: $100k → 8%WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 13%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%JOHN HOPKINS: $34k → 19%INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $31k → 14%WILDCAT HAVEN: $25k → 8%HOLY CROSS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $5k → 12%MEOW VILLAGE: $15k → 14%WILDCAT RIDGE: $25k → 3%ST THOMAS MOORE HIGH SCHOOL: $45k → 8%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS: $25k → 19%INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $30k → 14%WILDCAT HAVEN: $5k → 8%MEOW VILLAGE: $12k → 14%ST THOMAS MOORE HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 8%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS: $14k → 19%INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $1k → 14%WILDCAT HAVEN: $3k → 8%MEOW VILLAGE: $12k → 14%ST THOMAS MOORE HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 8%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%MEOW VILLAGE: $7k → 14%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $4k → 14%MEOW VILLAGE: $5k → 14%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $3k → 14%MEOW VILLAGE: $5k → 14%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $500 → 14%MEOW VILLAGE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
OR
CO
MD
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$674k · 10 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$674k
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+19%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalAnimalsHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN
    4× · 2021–2024 · $192k · revenue +16%
  • MV
    MEOW VILLAGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +53%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $27k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • JH
    JOHN HOPKINS
    one grant, 2022 · $34k
  • HC
    HOLY CROSS CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • GF
    GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR PEROXISOMAL DISORDERS
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Save Our Cats & Kittens From Feline Infectiou

Research into helping to prevent feline infectious peritonitis also raises awareness and support for fip research at uc davis

Animals
2
The Foundation for Aids Research

Amfar is dedicated to ending the global aids epidemic through innovative research. (see schedule o)

Health
3
Path

Path makes good health more accessible in 70+ countries by improving the health care people receive, creating affordable health products, and advancing effective health policies.

International
4
International Partnership for Microbicides Inc

To develop hiv prevention products and other sexual and reproductive health technologies for women, and to make them available and accessible where they are urgently needed.

—
5
600 Million Stray Dogs Need You Corporation

To end the #1 cause of suffering and death for dogs and cats globally, by developing food that will spay and neuter them, without surgery and end the overpopulation problem without killing. Humane education; fighting to prevent the…

Animals
6
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
7
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc

To create and lead alliances and public-private partnerships that advance breakthrough biomedical discoveries and improve the quality of people's lives

Health
8
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
9
Felidae Conservation Fund

Felidae's global mission1. conserve wild cats & biodiversity: protect 40+ wild felid species and their habitats worldwide.2. advance science & innovation: conduct cutting-edge research on wildlife health, genetics, and ecosystem…

Animals
10
Helen Keller International

Guided by her remarkable legacy of its co-founder, helen keller, helen keller intl partners with communities that are striving to overcome longstanding cycles of poverty. by delivering the essential building blocks of good health, sound…

International
11
Order of Malta Worldwide Relief Malteser International Americas

Mission:mia's mission is to protect the dignity and improve the health and well-being of suffering and displaced people in crisis situations throughout the americas, regardless of faith, political belief or origin. *continued on schedule o

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Eversight International

Preserving and restoring sight on a global scale.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Samaritan; the most unlike its peers is Meow Village. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST THOMAS MOORE HIGH SCHOOL: $160,000 · OtherST THOMAS MOORE HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $68,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJOHNS HOPKINS: $38,900 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINSJOHN HOPKINS: $34,353 · OtherJOHN HOPKINSIndividual grant recipient: $25,414 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOLY CROSS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $15,000 · Other+2 more: $15,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $191,510 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL SAMARITANMAYFLOWER MEDICAL OUTREACH INC: $8,500 · InternationalMEOW VILLAGE: $79,700 · AnimalsMEOW VILLAGE+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $27,000 · HealthGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR PEROXISOMAL DISORDERS: $10,000 · HealthWALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · Education
Other$421,667International$200,010Animals$80,700Health$37,000Education$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN: $191,510 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetMEOW VILLAGE: $79,700 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $27,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR PEROXISOMAL DISORDERS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMAYFLOWER MEDICAL OUTREACH INC: $8,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetWALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SAMARITAN ↗
  • Who funds MEOW VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR PEROXISOMAL DISORDERS ↗
  • Who funds MAYFLOWER MEDICAL OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Feral Cat Coalition of Oregon ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lindgren Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lindgren Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lindgren’s filings →

    More from the funding graph