Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Linda Caswell Berry & Sons Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$123k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$204kEducation$125kRecreation & Sports$59kPhilanthropy$55kHealth$26kCommunity Improvement$25kAnimals$21kYouth Development$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $102k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPRINGDALE NAZARENE CHURCH$11,000
CHRISTIAN HELP CENTER$10,000
YOUR STORE OF THE QUEEN CITY$7,500
THE VALLEY CHURCH$7,500
EMMANUEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$7,500
LUKE 5 ADVENTURES$6,000
URBAN APPALACHIAN COMMUNITY COALITION$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
INNER CINCINNATI SOCCER ACADEMY$5,000
ROGER BACON HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
NORWOOD MASONIC TEMPLE FOUNDATION$5,000
OHIO VALLEY VOICES$5,000
MAGNIFIED GIVING$5,000
INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 27%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%APPALACHIA REACH OUT: $15k → 36%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES: $1k → 16%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES: $400 → 16%CLERMONT SENIOR SERVICES: $400 → 16%OHIO SLED HOCKEY INC: $3k → 16%OHIO SLED HOCKEY: $2k → 16%OHIO SLED HOCKEY: $2k → 16%OHIO SLED HOCKEY: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
KY
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$474k · 41 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
38

Total granted

$474k
$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+26%

Still filing today

32%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NORWOOD MASONIC TEMPLE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    7× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +1%
  • OV
    OHIO VALLEY VOICES
    5× · 2018–2025 · $19k · revenue +78%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CHESTERLIBERT
    3× · 2018–2023 · $18k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • AR
    Appalachia Reach Outgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +69%
  • WS
    WT SPORTS COMPLEX INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
3
Cincinnati Christian University

The mission of cincinnati christian university is to teach men and women to live by biblical principles and to equip and empower them with character, skills, insight, and vision to lead the church and to impact society for christ.

—
4
Cincinnati Christian Schools Inc

Cincinnati christian schools, partnering with christian families, provides a bible-centered, quality educational program to equip, train, and disciple students to follow christ and impact culture.

Education
5
The Christ Hospital

Improve the health of our community and create patient value by providing exceptional outcomes and the finest experiences, all in an affordable way.

Health
6
Greater Columbus Chamber of Commerce

Advancing a thriving central ohio commmunity by serving as a catalyst for all businesses to grow and flourish. our mission pillars are connections, government relations, strategic business solutions and talent/workforce.

—
7
The University of Cincinnati Foundation

Mission: to inspire a community of uc and uc health supporters through the power of philanthropy. vision: igniting passion to transform lives.

Philanthropy
8
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
9
Ohio Justice and Policy Center

To create fair, intelligent, redemptive criminal justice systems through zealous client-centered advocacy, innovative policy reform and cross-sector community education.

Civil Rights
10
Owensboro Health Medical Group Inc

Owensboro health medical group, inc. exists to heal the sick and improve the health of the community.

Health
11
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Greater Cincinnati Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Appalachia Reach Out. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTIAN HELP CENTER FAMILY MINISTRIES: $55,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN HELP CENTER FAMILY MINISTRIESSPRINGDALE NAZARENE CHURCH: $44,000 · OtherSPRINGDALE NAZARENE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $34,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherHEALTHY VISIONS: $18,000 · OtherEMMANUEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $17,500 · OtherBROWN COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER: $16,500 · Other+62 more: $224,535 · Other+62 moreNORWOOD MASONIC TEMPLE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $36,000 · EducationNORWOOD MAS…OHIO VALLEY VOICES: $18,600 · EducationOHIO VALLEY…XAVIER UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · EducationXAVIER UNIV…+2 more: $2,900 · EducationTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $38,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GREAT…Magnified Giving: $16,630 · PhilanthropyMagnified…Appalachia Reach Out: $15,000 · Human ServicesOHIO SLED HOCKEY INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesClermont Senior Services Inc: $1,800 · Human ServicesYour Store of the Queen City: $12,500 · Community ImprovementURBAN APPALACHIAN COMMUNITY COALITION: $12,500 · Community ImprovementWT SPORTS COMPLEX INC: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsLUKE5ADVENTURES: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CHESTERLIBERT: $17,500 · Youth Development
Other$429,535Education$65,000Philanthropy$54,630Human Services$27,800Community Improvement$25,000Recreation & Sports$18,000Youth Development$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $38,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORWOOD MASONIC TEMPLE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $36,000 over 7y, 9.4% of budgetOHIO VALLEY VOICES: $18,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY VISIONS: $18,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CHESTERLIBERT: $17,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMagnified Giving: $16,630 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetAppalachia Reach Out: $15,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetYour Store of the Queen City: $12,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetURBAN APPALACHIAN COMMUNITY COALITION: $12,500 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetOHIO SLED HOCKEY INC: $9,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUKE5ADVENTURES: $6,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBack 2 Back Ministries Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClermont Senior Services Inc: $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFERNSIDE INC A CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEHOPE PANCREATIC CANCER RESEARCH: $675 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORWOOD MASONIC TEMPLE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds OHIO VALLEY VOICES ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY VISIONS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST CHESTERLIBERT ↗
  • Who funds Magnified Giving ↗
  • Who funds Appalachia Reach Out ↗
  • Who funds Your Store of the Queen City ↗
  • Who funds URBAN APPALACHIAN COMMUNITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds WT SPORTS COMPLEX INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO SLED HOCKEY INC ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LUKE5ADVENTURES ↗
  • Who funds 86 MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH26.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Northern Cincinnai Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Hcs Foundation · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Linda Caswell Berry & Sons Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Linda Caswell Berry & Sons Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Linda Caswell Berry & Sons Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Linda Caswell Berry & Sons Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Linda Caswell Berry & Sons’ filings →

    More from the funding graph