Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Linda Band Howard S Stern Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$444k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of THE LINDA BAND HOWARD S STERN FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $316k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$12,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WISCONSIN FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION-THE STERN FAMILY GERIATRIC FUND$100,000
HATZOLAH$36,000
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$30,000
HEART AND SOUL CHARITABLE FUNDINC$25,480
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$25,000
CITY HARVESTINC$25,000
GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER$25,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - HOPE LODGE NYC$21,669
EAST END HOSPICE$20,000
CAMERA$20,000
NEURODIVERSITY ALLIANCE$15,000
THE PARRISH MUSEUM$12,000
GENERATION SOS$10,500
DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$10,000
MUSELLA FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EAST END HOSPICE: $25k → 7%EAST END HOSPICE: $25k → 7%EAST END HOSPICE: $20k → 7%EAST END HOSPICE: $20k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
VA
TN
NC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 27 repeat orgs$271k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
8

Total granted

$3.1M
$237k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+43%

Still filing today

59%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $391k · revenue +39%
  • CP
    CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $205k · revenue +19%
  • CF
    COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • NL
    NYU LANGONE-GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • WF
    WISCONSIN FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $53k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

9
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY-HOPE LODGE NYC — $208,225 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY-HOPE LODGE NYCCITY HARVESTINC — $192,521 · OtherCITY HARVESTINCHATZOLAH — $185,042 · OtherHATZOLAHWISCONSIN FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION-THE STERN FAMILY GERIATRIC FUND — $165,000 · OtherWISCONSIN FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION-THE STERN FAMILY G…University of Michigan — $132,500 · OtherUniversity of MichiganSTJOSEPH'S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $126,612 · OtherSTJOSEPH'S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONTISCH MS RESEARCH CENTER — $112,500 · OtherTISCH MS RESEARCH CENTERNATIONAL MS SOCIETY — $111,000 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETYNYU LANGONE-GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $100,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE-GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINESADS FOUNDATION — $86,334 · OtherEast End Hospice Inc — $90,000 · Other+14 more — $360,409 · Other+14 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $391,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF W…WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNI…+1 more — $10,000 · EducationTHE MUSELLA FOUNDATION FOR BRAIN TUMOR RESEARCH AND INFORMATION INC — $202,288 · HealthTHE MUSELLA FO…CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION — $155,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARC…Young Leadership Addiction Awareness Inc — $46,883 · HealthYoung Leadersh…+3 more — $29,809 · Health+3 moreCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $204,656 · Recreation & SportsCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC — $170,000 · InternationalTHE HEART & SOUL CHARITABLE FUND INC — $125,963 · PhilanthropyGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $124,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,870,143Education$451,000Health$433,980Recreation & Sports$204,656International$170,000Philanthropy$125,963Food & Nutrition$124,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $391,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $204,656 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MUSELLA FOUNDATION FOR BRAIN TUMOR RESEARCH AND INFORMATION INC — $202,288 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC — $170,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION — $155,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $132,500 over 9y, 14% of budgetTHE HEART & SOUL CHARITABLE FUND INC — $125,963 over 5y, 16% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $124,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEast End Hospice Inc — $90,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Leadership Addiction Awareness Inc — $46,883 over 4y, 11% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF SOUTHAMPTON TOWN INC — $30,000 over 3y, 80% of budgetEYE TO EYE INC DBA THE NEURODIVERSITY ALLIANCE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $14,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Works — $12,767 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE HOPE PROGRAM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRING CHANGE 2 MIND — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,609 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE MUSELLA FOUNDATION FOR BRAIN TUMOR RESEARCH AND INFORMATION INC
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds THE HEART & SOUL CHARITABLE FUND INC
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC
  • Who funds East End Hospice Inc
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Young Leadership Addiction Awareness Inc
  • Who funds KIWANIS CLUB OF SOUTHAMPTON TOWN INC
  • Who funds FRIDAY SOUP KITCHEN NYC INC
  • Who funds EYE TO EYE INC DBA THE NEURODIVERSITY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
  • Who funds Charity Works
  • Who funds THE HOPE PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND
  • Who funds BRING CHANGE 2 MIND
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Linda Band Howard S Stern Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Linda Band Howard S Stern Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Linda Band Howard S Stern Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph