Skip to content
The Limo Almi Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Limo Almi Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$323kFood & Nutrition$175kHealth$127kYouth Development$55kArts & Culture$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kMembership Benefit$8kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $58k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES$50,000
HEART OF PPA2 INC$25,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$12,500
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL TRUST$10,000
TSC ALLIANCE$10,000
AMERICARES$5,000
BOSTON POLICE FOUNDATION$2,500
BOSTON FIREMEN'S RELIEF FUND$2,500
BOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS$2,500
FENWAY HEALTH$2,500
FRIENDS OF HAYES PARK$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $50k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $50k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$623k · 11 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$623k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+44%

Still filing today

82%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +35%
  • Cornell University
    7× · 2019–2025 · $83k · revenue +50%
  • WF
    WESTBURY FRIENDS SCHOOL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $73k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • I3
    INNERVISIONS 3T CLUB INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • LO
    LEKOTEK OF GA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • NC
    NAMI Collier County Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +73%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Boston Children's Network Specialty Physicians Inc

BCNSP supports the following three pillars of Boston Children's Hospital's four-part mission: (1) providing care to individuals in the community, (2) improving clinical care to its patients, and (3) educating and training clinicians. In…

Health
4
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
5
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
8
Brockton Hospital Inc

Signature healthcare brockton hospital is a community-based not-for-profit (continued on schedule o)

Health
9
Pediatric Physician Services Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, and to provide healthcare services of pediatric specialty physicians and other personnel to the patients of johns hopkins all children's hospital and…

—
10
Children's Hospital Pathology Foundation Inc

The Foundation's mission is to provide pathology services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the field…

Health
11
Physicians Organization at Children's Hospital Inc

The Organization operates exclusively for the benefit of the charitable purposes of Boston Children's Hospital (the Hospital) and the affiliated Foundations. It works jointly with the Hospital and the Foundations in developing and…

Health
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fenway Community Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boston Firemen's Relief Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SW FLORIDA INC: $175,000 · OtherHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SW FLORIDA INCCHILDREN OF PROMISE: $40,000 · OtherCHILDREN OF PROMISENAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · OtherNAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCINNERVISIONS 3T CLUB INC: $15,025 · OtherLEKOTEK OF GA INC: $15,000 · Other+8 more: $43,500 · Other+8 moreCornell University: $82,500 · EducationCornell UniversityWESTBURY FRIENDS SCHOOL: $72,500 · EducationWESTBURY FRIENDS SCHOOLFRIENDS ACADEMY: $17,500 · EducationFRIENDS ACADEMYGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDR…NATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · HealthNATIONAL TUBER…HEART OF PPA2 INC: $25,000 · HealthHEART OF PPA2 …Children's Hospital Corporation: $10,000 · HealthChildren's Hos…BOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC: $5,000 · HealthFENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $5,000 · HealthPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $5,000 · AnimalsAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · InternationalThe Boston Police Foundation Inc: $2,500 · PhilanthropyBOSTON FIREMEN'S RELIEF FUND: $2,500 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$308,525Education$172,500Human Services$150,000Health$95,000Animals$5,000International$5,000Philanthropy$2,500Public Safety & Disaster$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCornell University: $82,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWESTBURY FRIENDS SCHOOL: $72,500 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetNATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHEART OF PPA2 INC: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS ACADEMY: $17,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES OF CHILDREN UNDER STRESS INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON FIREMEN'S RELIEF FUND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Charities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA10.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Limo Almi Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Limo Almi Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Boston Community Pediatrics Inc: 10% of income from government
  • National Tuberous Sclerosis Association: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Limo Almi’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home