· Private foundation
The Lewis and Joan Lowenstein Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $208k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON | $25,000 |
| SEVEN ACRES JEWISH SENIOR CARE SERVICES | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATES BEN GURION UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| ST DOMINIC VILLAGE | $15,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $15,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,500 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON HOUSTON | $12,500 |
| JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA | $12,500 |
| SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $12,500 |
| CRISTO REY JESUIT COLLEGE | $12,500 |
| CHRISTUS FOUNDATION FOR HEALTHCARE | $12,500 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER | $12,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| ST PIUS X HIGH SCHOOL | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $626k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
61 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JIJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA8× · 2017–2024 · $190k · revenue +62%
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE8× · 2017–2024 · $185k · revenue +15%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON7× · 2017–2024 · $181k · revenue +139%
Funded once
- TITHE IRVIN M SHLENKER SCHOOL OF CONGREGATION BETH ISRAELone grant, 2017 · $40k
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERone grant, 2021 · $25k
- HFHEROES FOR CHILDRENgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.
Our mission is to provide high quality and caring services to promote healthy people and communities.
The Houston Area Women's Center (HAWC) works to end domestic and sexual violence and supports all in building safe and healthy lives through advocacy, counseling, education, shelter, and support services.
Community information now (cinow) provides data, tools, analysis, and training to inform decisions to improve texas communities. cinow's vision is improved lives and decreased disparities through democratized data.
Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…
Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…
Houston Hospice provides uncompromising, compassionate end-of-life care to patients and families in our community. Houston Hospice cares for patients from all races, ethnicities, religious beliefs, and payor classes, including those with…
Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.
LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.
Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…
The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center holds a freestanding 37 bed inpatient facility in the Texas Medical Center that is operated and managed by Houston Hospice.
The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Houston Community Health Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Therapy Pet Pals of Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds SEVEN ACRES JEWISH SENIOR CARE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Evelyn Rubenstein Jewish Community Center of Houston ↗
- Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare ↗
- Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
- Who funds ST DOMINIC VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds PROUNITAS INC ↗
- Who funds YES Prep Public Schools Inc ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Houston ↗
- Who funds ALLEY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds Houston Hillel ↗
- Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE WORKFAITH CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds CASA DE ESPERANZA DE LOS NINOS INC ↗
- Who funds MEXICAN INSTITUTE OF GREATER HOUSTON INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON ACHIEVEMENT PLACE ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS ↗
- Who funds ST THOMAS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New Hope Housing Inc ↗
- Who funds CASA JUAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds Undies for Everyone ↗
- Who funds SANTA MARIA HOSTEL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Strake Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Marek Family Foundation · MD Anderson Foundation · The Methodist Hospital · The Zions Bancorporation Foundation · Charity Guild of Catholic Women of Harris County Inc · The Elkins Foundation · United Way of Greater Houston
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Lewis and Joan Lowenstein Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Lewis and Joan Lowenstein Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Lewis and Joan Lowenstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.