Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$58k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
12
Grants FY2025
12
Organizations funded FY2024
33%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 12
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$711k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 33% of the organizations The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn funded were first-time grantees, receiving 41% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHousing & ShelterAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving12$58k17%
FY202412$55k33%
FY20239$40k11%
FY20229$42k22%
FY20219$50k11%
FY20209$42k33%
FY20199$44k33%
FY20189$45k44%
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$102kHealth$100kHuman Services$74kArts & Culture$53kHousing & Shelter$25kEducation$23kAnimals$14kPublic Benefit$8kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($87k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPhipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens Inc: $78,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEye and Ear Foundation: $67,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSisters Place Inc: $25,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetWestern Pennsylvania Conservancy: $23,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPittsburgh Public Theater Corporation: $23,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetClear Thoughts Foundation: $22,100 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetNorth Hills Community Outreach Inc: $18,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNational Aviary in Pittsburgh Inc: $13,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Utah Avalanche Fore Cast Center Inc: $12,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPittsburgh Symphony Inc: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLiteracy Pittsburgh: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPittsburgh Cultural Trust: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe City Theatre Company Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCatholic Charities Diocese of Venice Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetReading Is Fundamental Pittsburgh: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRadiant Hall Studios: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWestmoreland County Food Bank Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family FoundationsPA27.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Heinz Endowments · Eqt Foundation · Howard & Nell E Miller Foundat · The Burke Family Foundation · The Burke Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn with peer funders

About The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn

How much does The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn give?
The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn reported 12 grants totaling $58,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 12 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (24%), Health (24%), Human Services (18%).
Who are The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens Inc ($78k), Eye and Ear Foundation ($68k), Sisters Place Inc ($25k).
Does The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Hillman Family Foundations, The Pittsburgh Foundation, The Grable Foundation.
Where is The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn based?
The Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lewis a and Donna M Patterson Char Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph