Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$190k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
26
Grants FY2025
24
Organizations funded FY2024
8%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$4,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$30,000
Organizations funded a year
24 to 30
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
7
Total assets, FY2025
$2.4M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 8% of the organizations The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer funded were first-time grantees, receiving 17% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving25$182k8%
FY202424$157k8%
FY202325$166k4%
FY202230$194k20%
FY202124$168k4%
FY202024$177k21%
FY201926$180k12%
FY201827$176k33%
94% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$622kEducation$458kHuman Services$102kHealth$97kEmployment$60kAnimals$49kCommunity Improvement$37kEnvironment$28kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
CT
CA
WV
TN
NC
DC
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Unity Presbyterian Church$291,0009n/a
The Foundation for Indiana University of Pennsylvania (Iup)$175,00060%
University of Pittsburgh$110,50090%
King School Inc$86,25090%
Goodwill of Southwestern Pennsylvania$50,00050%
Light of Life Mission Inc$47,1509n/a
Humane Animal Rescue$40,00050%
St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc$35,00080%
Nash Education Corporation$20,000769%
Women Investing in Security and Education$19,00083%
Show all 27 grantees
All grantees of The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Unity Presbyterian Church$291,0009n/a
The Foundation for Indiana University of Pennsylvania (Iup)$175,00060%
University of Pittsburgh$110,50090%
King School Inc$86,25090%
Goodwill of Southwestern Pennsylvania$50,00050%
Light of Life Mission Inc$47,1509n/a
Humane Animal Rescue$40,00050%
St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc$35,00080%
Nash Education Corporation$20,000769%
Women Investing in Security and Education$19,00083%
Honduras Hope Mission$16,00082%
Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank$14,00060%
Fostercat Inc$9,00092%
Autism Connection of Pa$8,00081%
American Cancer Society Inc$8,00080%
Off the Floor Pittsburgh$5,00011%
Women of Southwestern Pa Inc$4,80051%
Pauline Auberle Foundation$4,00040%
Noah Angelici Hope Foundation$4,00021%
Tc Open Charitable Foundation$3,30032%
Days For Girls International$2,50010%
First Presbyterian Church of Bakerstown$2,0001n/a
Northside Common Ministries$2,0002n/a
The Long Ridge School Inc$1,00010%
American Heart Association Inc$1,00010%
Be Not Afraid Inc$50010%
Horses With Hope Inc$50010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 24 recipients with no EIN on record ($606k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 23 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Foundation for Indiana University of Pennsylvania (Iup): $175,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Pittsburgh: $110,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKing School Inc: $86,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGoodwill of Southwestern Pennsylvania: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Animal Rescue: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSt Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc: $35,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNash Education Corporation: $20,000 over 7y, 69% of budgetWomen Investing in Security and Education: $19,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetHonduras Hope Mission: $16,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetGreater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFostercat Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetAutism Connection of Pa: $8,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Cancer Society Inc: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOff the Floor Pittsburgh: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWomen of Southwestern Pa Inc: $4,800 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetPauline Auberle Foundation: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNoah Angelici Hope Foundation: $4,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTc Open Charitable Foundation: $3,300 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetDays For Girls International: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Long Ridge School Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBe Not Afraid Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHorses With Hope Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 23.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Upmc Group · Edward B Dunlap Jr Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer?

Find your warmest path to The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer

How much does The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer give?
The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer reported 26 grants totaling $189,575 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 24 and 30 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (39%), Education (29%), Human Services (6%).
Who are The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Unity Presbyterian Church ($291k), The Foundation for Indiana University of Pennsylvania (Iup) ($175k), University of Pittsburgh ($111k).
Does The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Pittsburgh Foundation, Eqt Foundation, Upmc Group.
Where is The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer based?
The Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Leonard a and Mary Jane Schafer’s filings →

More from the funding graph