How much did THE LEO & EMOGENE CASE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of THE LEO & EMOGENE CASE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

countries

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k24 grants · $108k
$10k–50k11 grants · $223k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.5M

Total assets

Largest grants

SAMARITANS PURSE$35,000
TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH$34,500
MERCY SHIPS$28,000
INDEPENDENT TRACK CHAIRS FOR DISABL$27,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$23,000
TUNNELLS TO TOWERS$20,000
ALZHEIMERS ASS$14,000
WOUNDED WARRIORS$11,000
ST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
FRIENDSHIP BAPTIST CHURCH$10,000
SALVATION ARMY KERRYVILLE$10,000
BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP$9,500
THE SMILE TRAIN$9,000
PEGASUS PROJECT$6,000
CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY$6,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.9M · 38 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

38 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.9M

$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%

+136%

Still filing today

39%

20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthReligionInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SP
SAMARITANS PURSE
7× · 2018–2024 · $169k · revenue +134%
MERCY SHIPS
7× · 2018–2024 · $149k · revenue +303%
BI
BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL
7× · 2018–2024 · $52k · revenue +129%

Funded once

TC
TRACK CHAIRS FOR DISABLED VETS
one grant, 2018 · $30k
SH
SHRINERS HOSPITAL
one grant, 2018 · $20k
SJ
ST JUDES RESEACH HOSPITAL
one grant, 2018 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Grace Farm Animal Rescue and Sanctuary

Animals

Second Chance Animal Sanctuaries

Organization's mission or most significant activities ot provide humane, no kill sanctuaries for the care and rehabilitation of abandoned and at-risk animals. to provide compassionate, animal-friendly environments that respect the dignity…

Animals

Compassionate Animal Rescue for

Compassionate animal rescue for medical aid was founded by veterinary professionals dedicated to enhancing the lives of our community through our love for animals. our purpose is to rescue sick or injured animals, provide them with…

Animals

Kentucky Humane Society - Animal Rescue

The kentucky humane society is a champion for companion animals, through leadership, education and proactive solutions, we are creating more compassionate communities.

Animals

Harmony Animal Rescue Clinic

Helping animal rescue organizations save more lives by providing timely, low-cost veterinary care is the mission of harmony animal rescue clinic.

Animals

Zions Mission Animal Rescue Inc

Zions Mission Animal Rescue is a NYC based 501c3 non-profit animal rescue specializing in dogs. Our mission is to rescue rehabilitate train and find loving homes for as many abused abandoned neglected and unwanted animals as possible. We…

Animals

Westminster Rescue Mission

The westminster rescue mission is a community that provides clinical, physical, and spiritual resources to heal the addicted and feed the hungry. we take a holistic approach with christ as the foundation of our work.

Housing & Shelter

Pawlicious Poochie Pet Rescue Inc

Rescuing old hospice critically injured and handicap small dogs fro kill shelters and owner surrenders. Spays neuters medications orthopedic surgeries dental surgeries vaccines cardio care echocardiograms heartworm prevention and treatment…

Animals

Second Chance Animal Shelter

Our mission is: -to improve the lives of animals by rescuing, rehabilitating, and rehoming domestic animals in need -to reduce domestic animal overpopulation through education and support of spay & neuter efforts -to provide resources to…

Animals

Mercer County Humane Society

The mission of the mercer county humane society is preventing cruelty to animals, providing relief for suffering among animals and providing education about preventing animal abuse. the organization provides humane care and treatment for…

Animals

Mercy Mission Ii

Human Services

Last Chance Dog Ranch Inc

We are a dog sanctuary for unadoptable dogs.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaqua Animal Refuge Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mercy Ships International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/20

Grantees still filing

16/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,407,900Religion$227,000International$149,300Human Services$98,000Animals$97,800Health$90,000Education$23,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robert and Marilyn Zieve FoundationTX13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robert and Marilyn Zieve Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Texas · Shell USA Company Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE LEO & EMOGENE CASE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WESTWOOD MINISTRIES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 752302245 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WESTWOOD MINISTRIES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Leo & Emogene Case Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Leo & Emogene Case Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE LEO & EMOGENE CASE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Leo & Emogene Case Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE LEO & EMOGENE CASE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Leo & Emogene Case Foundation?

More from the funding graph