Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lenox D and Frances W Baker Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$734kEducation$235kAnimals$172kArts & Culture$148kHealth$50kYouth Development$21kRecreation & Sports$10kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $84k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY HEALTHY WATERS$49,025
ROWLAND HALL$15,000
THE LINDSEY VONN FOUNDATION$10,000
MEETEETSE MUSEUM FOUNDATION$10,000
IRONSIDE BIRD RESCUE$2,000
DAVIDSON COLLEGE$1,000
CARLETON COLLEGE$1,000
EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
LUKE BELL MEMORIAL AFFORDABLE COUNSELING$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%NORTHWEST WYOMING FAMILY PLANNING: $3k → 11%NORTHWEST WYOMING FAMILY PLANNING: $2k → 11%NORTHWEST WYOMING FAMILY PLANNING: $1k → 11%NORTHWEST WYOMING FAMILY PLANNING: $1k → 11%NORTHWEST WYOMING FAMILY PLANNING: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
WY
OH
CA
UT
CO
VA
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 22 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
10

Total granted

$1.3M
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+112%

Still filing today

64%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    ROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +81%
  • CC
    CARLETON COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +39%
  • PC
    PARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER
    3× · 2021–2023 · $48k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • HE
    HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +112%
  • MR
    MEETEETSE RECREATION CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
Explorer West an Independent Middle School

We empower young people to explore and grow their unique intellectual, ethical, and creative capabilities, and to treasure diversity and growth in others.

Education
3
The Wyldlife Fund

To unite people to advance wyoming wildlife habitat, research, and education.

Animals
4
Wild Rockies Field Institute Inc

To broaden the nature of a liberal arts education; teach critical thinking about social & environmental issues; foster understanding of & respect for natural & human communities; & cultivate a sense of place that encourages personal,…

Education
5
Wyoming Seminary College Preparatory School

Wyoming seminary inspires students to lead lives of integrity, purpose, and excellence by developing the critical skills and spirit of community necessary to succeed and serve in a global society.

Education
6
The Landmark Society of Western New York Inc

To educate the community as to the significance of their architectural and historic heritage through the preservation, protection, improvement, and restoration of sites and buildings in western new york that are of historic or civic…

Arts & Culture
7
Wyoming Wildlife Federation

Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.

Animals
8
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
9
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
10
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
11
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
12
Fountain Valley School of Colorado

Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of the Old West; the most unlike its peers is Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATURE CONSERVANCY WYOMING CHAPTER: $650,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY WYOMING CHAPTERPARK COUNTY ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherPARK COUNTY ANIMAL HOSPITALTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY HEALTHY WATERS: $49,025 · OtherWEST PARK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Other+14 more: $160,250 · Other+14 moreROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL: $125,000 · EducationROWLAND HALL-ST…CARLETON COLLEGE: $58,000 · EducationCARLETON COLLEG…THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA: $7,000 · EducationDavidson College: $7,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationMeeteetse Museum Foundation Inc: $71,000 · Arts & CultureBY WESTERN HANDS: $30,000 · Arts & CultureHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER: $48,000 · AnimalsWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $35,000 · EnvironmentWILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE: $6,500 · EnvironmentTHE LINDSEY VONN FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHWEST WYOMING FAMILY PLANNING INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesIntermountain Planned Parenthood: $3,000 · HealthYELLOWSTONE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Health
Other$994,275Education$198,000Arts & Culture$111,000Animals$48,000Environment$41,500Youth Development$20,000Human Services$11,000Health$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL: $125,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMeeteetse Museum Foundation Inc: $71,000 over 9y, 16% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $58,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER: $48,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $35,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetBY WESTERN HANDS: $30,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetTHE LINDSEY VONN FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetNORTHWEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST WYOMING FAMILY PLANNING INC: $8,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDavidson College: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE OLD WEST: $7,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE: $6,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetIntermountain Planned Parenthood: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBright Futures Mentoring Program: $1,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Meeteetse Museum Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PARK COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds BY WESTERN HANDS ↗
  • Who funds THE LINDSEY VONN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HENRY E HUNTINGTON LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST WYOMING FAMILY PLANNING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds Davidson College ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE OLD WEST ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE ECOLOGY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Intermountain Planned Parenthood ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bright Futures Mentoring Program ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wyoming Community FoundationWY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lenox D and Frances W Baker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lenox D and Frances W Baker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lenox D and Frances W Baker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph